| As the basic social unit of people’s production and life,villages’ governance order,social structure and livelihood mode all reflect the governance pattern and development level of a country to some extent.Village order presents phased characteristics with social development,and the construction methods of village order in different social stages are not entirely similar,but they are basically coupled with the construction situations of two social orders,which Hayek calls "autonomous and spontaneous order" and "artificial order".The change of village order is essentially a more concrete and structured expression of the national village governance process.Through field investigation,the researcher found that the three physical Spaces,Manikon,public canteen and public house,are the continuity of the public buildings in Unity village with mixed ethnic groups,and are the materialized expression of social governance in different historical stages of the village.The different building names represent the different development backgrounds of the community,and also reflect the different places where the social association is generated under different backgrounds.This spatial form relates the spatial form with the Order of the village governance,and peeks at the process of order construction in the village governance change from the architectural perspective.This leads to deep thinking: think: whether this architectural space can be seen as the carrier of the construction of the village governance order,what is the relationship between the two?Based on this,from the perspective of architectural space,this study attempts to peer into the role of public space in the construction of village Unity’s governance order,and inquire into the village order and its generation path behind it.On a linear basis,taking the public space of Manicon,public canteen and public house in different development stages as the context,the change and game between the village management and the performance of the action subject in the diachronic and synchronic levels are discussed.To explain the development process of the "endogenous village" public space(Manicon)dominated by "natural order" in the feudal society of village Unity,the "administrative embedding" public space(canteen)dominated by "constructive order" in the people’s commune period,and the "multiple authority co-governance" public space(public house)dominated by "conspiratorial order" after the reform and opening up.To clarify the relationship between the village governance model projected in the village core public space and the construction of village order,and then draw the following conclusions:Relying on the architectural space of the village,the general trajectory of the generation and reconstruction of village order can be seen throughout.The public spaces of the village,including Manikang,public cafeteria,and public housing,are the social communication center,information center,and political center of the village at different historical stages.They are the generating field of power and order in the construction of village order,and also the carrier of governance authority and order.The physical space has been endowed with special symbolic meaning,reflecting the evolution of village governance order and its trend from a single-phase pluralistic,autocratic to pluralistic governance pattern. |
