Research On Anti-monopoly Legal Regulations Of Platform Economy

In recent years,our country’s platform economy has developed a lot of barbaric growth,and has become a pillar of the national economy.Big data,AI,algorithm and other high-tech parties change lifestyle.However,due to the inertia of the development of capital itself,some platform companies have carried out various monopoly behaviors that affect the normal market competition order in order to continue to occupy the market and expand the number of users,and harm the interests of all parties.Based on free pricing models,Two-Sided market,users Lock in effect,Network externality,and other characteristics,in the past,when monopoly regulation of the "Anti-Monopoly Law" and "E-commerce Law",it was often stretched when monopolized the platform economy field.Therefore,how to base on the traditional Anti-monopoly law theory and combine the new characteristics of the platform economy to reconstruct the basic theoretical scope of Anti-monopoly in the field of online platform economy is the key to this study.Therefore,this paper adopts case analysis method,comparative analysis method,literature analysis method,etc.to study antitrust regulations in the economic field of the Internet platform in my country.At the same time,learn from the legislative experience and practical experience of countries such as Europe,America,and Japan,and combine our country’s actual national conditions,and put forward targeted improvement suggestions,with a view to provide useful references for relevant legislation and judicial law enforcement practice in my country.There are five parts in this article,which are expanded from the following aspects:In the first part,analogy overview of the platform economy.Including the basic meaning and characteristics of the platform economy,classification,platform monopoly hazards and necessity of regulation,my country’s current legislative regulations.The second part is the current status of the platform’s economic development.Including the current status of platform economic development and the current status of my country’s development.In the third part,antitrust regulation in the field of platform economy.Including the centralized review of operators in the field of platform economy,monopoly agreements in the field of platform fields,dilemma of legal regulations,and poor implementation of disciplinary punishment for implementation of lagging and anti-monopoly implementation.The fourth part is an off-the-domain inspection.Compare the EU,the United States,and Japan’s main antitrust regions in the field of Internet platforms to compare the competition policies and practical experience,and provide a reference for my country’s antitrust of the Internet platform abuse of market dominance.Part 5,improve suggestions.Improve the method of identifying the relevant market and market dominance of platform enterprises: adjust and improve,supplement the SSNIP method;market dominance status identification comprehensive considerations,active users,online clicks and other factors to jointly confirm the market share;improve the centralized review of the platform field: Improve the reporting standard,strengthening voluntary reporting obligations;Improve the hub-and-spoke agreement recognition as a standard,if the enterprise directly acts through intentional contact or unintentional contact,the other party enterprise actively cooperates and makes a unified pricing or business strategy,and There is evidence to prove that the above corporate behavior is consistent and correlated,and it can be prevented that it has a "common contest".Improve the implementation mechanism: Adopt a combination of advance reports,supervision and post-after-inspection,to split and reorganize large monopoly Internet platform enterprises.