Grass roots governance is the cornerstone of national governance.In recent years,urban governance,as an important part of the national governance system,has attracted much attention.The Third Plenary Session of the 18 th Central Committee of the CPC first wrote grid governance into the party’s documents,marking that grid governance has changed from the original innovative exploration of individual places to the general requirements of the central government for local social governance.The original intention of grid governance is to timely resolve conflicts and disputes at the grass-roots level and in the bud.However,whether a policy can achieve the expected goals,in addition to whether the design itself is scientific and reasonable,whether it can be effectively implemented is also a key factor.This study focuses on the dilemma of selective implementation in community grid governance.Through the survey of T community in C city,it is found that grid members will consider the visibility,urgency and risk of tasks when performing their duties,thus resulting in a tendency to focus on hard rather than soft,focus on near rather than far,and focus on top rather than bottom,and strategically adopt flexible,perfunctory or sluggish ways to complete the work.The emergence of selective execution is not only related to the subjective factors of policy executors,but also shaped by the organizational and institutional environment in which they live.This study uses the equity theory to analyze from the individual level,and uses the pressure type system and collusion theory to discuss from the perspective of organization and system.Specifically,the tension between high pressure and low incentive gives birth to the internal power of selective execution,the tension between grid generalization and resource shortage constitutes the external thrust of selective execution,and the administration and collusion of grid governance provide environmental conditions for selective execution.On this basis,this paper puts forward policy suggestions for improving grid governance from four aspects. |