Research On The Local Legislative Mode Of Electric Vehicle Governance

The governance of electric vehicles is closely related to People’s Daily life,its legal norms are rich,the local practices are varied,and the legal issues involved are complicated and controversial.With the prosperity of local legislation,different practices in different places objectively make citizens encounter different treatment based on the same behavior,and more and more voices of doubts and dissatisfaction.So study the local legislation mode of electric vehicle governance,found that its deficiencies and efforts to improve,not only from the legislation on the source of the people’s livelihood problems,and help to see,from the "dissecting sparrow" to local legislation model provide general experience for reference.There are many numbers of electric vehicle governance norms,multiple forms,and there is an internal logic.There are two basic rules: one is to give full play to the local legislative initiative under the guidance of the central government;the other is that the classified regulation of electric bicycles,low-speed electric vehicles and the integrated regulation of electric vehicles can coexist.Relevant norms show four obvious characteristics,namely: diversified forms and concentrated content;complete levels of local laws and regulations,selective legislation;rich timeliness;wide overall distribution and small local quantity.Compared with the "high-power behavior" shown in administrative management,the local legislation mode of electric vehicle governance can be summarized as "high-power legislation mode".Under this,it can be subdivided into "one-way legislation mode" and "two-way legislation mode" according to whether there is public participation.Due to the legitimacy of the policy tools,the lack of the legitimacy of the local legislation model,the lack of local legislation,the effectiveness of the legislative model,which can be reflected in six aspects,including the visual presentation,the accident data of a large number of general normative documents,the frequent modification of local legislation,the specific content of the single regulation model,the legislative conflict of the same policy tool and the lack of "high-power legislative model" itself.The reasons for the lack of effectiveness can be summarized as two:diversified legislative forms,unclear functional positioning,and solidified mode to meet the differentiated needs of local governments.In view of the legitimacy of the local legislation model,three aspects include the interpretation of the concept terms,seeking the legal basis from the Administrative Punishment Law,gradually clarifying the scope of legislation;for the effectiveness of the local legislation model,two aspects,namely,the provincial pooling,reducing the legislative level and form,targeting the local prominent problems and strengthening the public participation.