An Empirical Study On The Construction Of Legalized Business Environment In L County

This paper takes the construction of the legalized business environment in L County and its problems in reality as the research object,using empirical analysis as the main method,supplemented by questionnaire surveys,group interviews and statistical analysis and other research methods.Analyze and summarize various elements of the business environment and establish a model comparison to make a systematic and comprehensive understanding of the construction of the legalized business environment in the county.In addition,on this basis,the author selects some weak and typical problems from the elements of legalized business environment construction,such as insufficient protection of market name infringement and related risks,rigid reform of commercial domicile,“ license reform ” and government services In-depth exploration of the organization’s non-optimization,etc.,so as to study the solutions to these problems through empirical analysis results.In a region,including a county,the construction of a legalized business environment is reflected in all aspects.It is feasible to evaluate the progress of L County’s construction of a legalized business environment from the relevant data and the intuitive feelings of reform participants.From a macro perspective,the construction of a rule-of-law business environment can be quantitatively analyzed and studied from the legal environment,law enforcement environment,judicial environment,government affairs environment and law-abiding environment.The factors will also be based on the diversity of market entities and the rule of law.The construction of the business environment involves the interests of all reform participants and is complex and changeable.From a micro perspective,due to the lag of the law and the contradiction between the rapid economic development,the unreasonable allocation of administrative resources and the failure to modernize the social governance system,L County has experienced market name infringement protection in some aspects of the business environment.Insufficient prevention of related risks,rigid reform of commercial domiciles,"license reform" and unoptimized government service agencies.There is a dilemma of conflicting legal values ??in the design of legislation and systems.Therefore,on the basis of balancing the interests of all parties,it is an inevitable choice to find solutions to the problems found,and to scientifically optimize the business environment guarantee work including the allocation of administrative resources and the restructuring of the administrative power structure.From the perspective of free value,firstly,the effective legal risk prevention mechanism of market entities improves the degree of freedom of civil activities of commercial entities and stimulates the economic vitality of local market entities;secondly,the relaxation of the registration conditions for commercial domiciles of market entities reduces market access The threshold is good for economic development;then,the optimal allocation of administrative resources and the establishment of an efficient and shared information platform will bring the social governance effect of public power to an optimal state and reduce the additional operating burden of market players;finally,by improving The design of legislation and top-level systems removes the shackles of reality in order to integrate redundant institutions,improve administrative efficiency,and reduce social governance costs.However,from the perspective of order value,adopting legal means to protect all legitimate rights and interests including market name rights and safeguard the legitimate interests of interested parties who are damaged after the opening of the commercial domicile registration conditions,the unimpeded administrative relief channels will reduce them.The cost of rights protection is particularly critical."Certificate reform" and institutional reform for the sake of efficiency and convenience,or the risk of leakage of citizen information,deterioration of the administrative team,and abuse of administrative power due to the lack of supervision system.Considering various values,a reasonable balance of the interests of all parties is obtained,so as to design a reasonable social governance system.In this way,a place’s business environment guarantee work can always sail in the right direction.