Is The Ignorant Innocent?

Whether "the ignorant is innocent" is true is a topic that we repeatedly consider in the practical conditions.This article hopes to analyze the debate on epistemic justification in recent philosophy,summarize the shortcomings of various debates,and then propose an effective plan for grasping epistemic justification from the perspective of epistemology.In addition,it further analyzes the epistemological stance implicit in "whether the ignorant are innocent",while combining the legal perspective,providing more specific reasons and opinions for the truth and falsehood of the proposition "whether the ignorant are innocent".The full text is mainly divided into three parts to explain and analyze the issue of epistemic justification.Firstly,based on the "JTB theory" and the Gettier problem,this paper conducts a preliminary review and overall analysis of the solutions to the Gettier problem,and reveals that the solutions to the Gettier problem have not solved the problem,but rather led to epistemic justification being bogged down and even becoming increasingly chaotic.Secondly,explain the reasons for the existence of the Gaiter problem and explain that the Gaiter problem logically has no solution.However,the counterexamples of Gettier and Gettier-style raise the standard of knowledge,but this is not conducive to answering practical questions of law.Therefore,it is necessary to distinguish the knowledge that satisfies the practical standard from the knowledge that satisfies the theoretical standard,and analyze the knowledge that satisfy the practical conditions by the interactive relationship between deduction and inductive reasoning.Finally,from a multidimensional perspective of practical knowledge and law,we answer the question of "whether the ignorant is innocent" from a multidimensional perspective of epistemology and jurisprudence,and compare the consistency of the answers from different perspectives.That is,"the ignorant are innocent" or "the ignorant are guilty" is a proposition that can be established only in a specific context,and "the ignorant are guilty" is a constantly evolving and changing dynamic proposition;Then inductive method and deductive method are used to explain and demonstrate the conclusion.