In recent years,the rapid economic development has promoted the continuous improvement of people’s living standards and quality.The Party and the country have always adhered to the goal of improving people’s lives and building a better life.However,the development of public health emergencies has caused a variety of social and economic contradictions,which has seriously hindered people’s quality of life,but also has a great harm to people’s life and property safety.In social governance,the government plays a leading role in actively responding to public health emergencies and resolving their negative impacts in a timely manner,which is an important indicator of the government’s emergency management ability.As a big agricultural country,compared with urban areas,the rural area is an important position in facing public health emergencies,and belongs to the front position in emergency management.But due to the factors of funds,resources and other factors,the rural area has become a weak link in dealing with public health emergencies.As an important infectious disease in the world,the novel coronavirus epidemic has a great impact on rural areas and seriously threatens the life,health and property safety of people in rural areas due to its strong transmission capacity,great harm and wide impact.In addition,in the national and social governance system,rural areas,as an important component,play a cornerstone role,and their stability and well-being have a great impact on the development of the whole country.Therefore,strengthening epidemic response in rural areas is not only to meet the needs of responding to public health emergencies under modernization,but also to promote national development and governance level under modernization.However,in the face of sudden public health emergencies,it is not only a test of the government’s emergency response ability,but also needs the participation of the public.For citizens,public participation is not only an obligation,but also a responsibility.How to improve the enthusiasm of the public to participate in the response to public health emergencies is a key link in emergency management.In this public health emergency response to the novel coronavirus outbreak,S Town of Binzhou City actively responded to the call of the country,strictly implemented the relevant policies,and achieved good results in the response to the epidemic.However,more problems were also highlighted in the public participation.Therefore,through the investigation and analysis of the public participation in S Town,This paper summarizes the current situation of public participation in coping with public health emergencies,as well as the existing problems and causes,and puts forward specific suggestions,which provides reference experience for villagers to participate in coping with public health emergencies in the future,and has important significance.Therefore,this paper conducts research from the following parts:First of all,the background and significance involved in this paper are analyzed,and relevant research data at home and abroad are combed to confirm the content and methods of the research.Secondly,define the concept clearly and determine the theoretical basis of the research.Thirdly,through literature review,questionnaire survey and interview,the current situation of villagers’ participation in the prevention and control of COVID-19 in S Town of Binzhou City is understood,and the methods of participating in the prevention and control of COVID-19 in S Town of Binzhou City mainly include individual participation and group participation,direct participation and indirect participation,written participation,network participation and oral participation.And achieved good results.Then,through questionnaire survey,it summarizes the existing problems of villagers’ participation in COVID-19 prevention and control in S Town of Binzhou City,which mainly include:low sense of community identity,low enthusiasm for participation and unbalanced situation,narrow participation channels,lack of social organizations in response to public health emergencies,and more interest driven sense of participation;The reasons for the above problems are as follows:lack of sense of belonging,lack of incentive for villagers to participate in autonomy,unimpeded channels for villagers to participate,single form of organizational participation,lack of interest mechanism and lack of institutional guarantee.Finally,the paper puts forward suggestions to improve villagers’ participation in public health emergencies from five aspects:strengthening villagers’ sense of identity,improving villagers’ willingness to participate in public health emergencies,expanding villagers’ ways to participate in public health emergencies,strengthening the construction and ability improvement of village two committees,and making good use of incentive mechanism. |