Comparative Study On Typical Models Of Rural Household Garbage Classification And Treatment

As an important link in the improvement of rural living environment,the sorting and treatment of rural household garbage is of great significance to the construction of "ecological livable" socialist new countryside.Under the background of the national strategy of rural revitalization,various places have carried out practical exploration of rural garbage classification and treatment,and numerous representative rural household garbage classification and treatment modes have emerged.Guided by green development theory,public governance theory and transaction cost theory,this paper comprehensively uses literature review method,field interview method,questionnaire survey method and other methods to conduct field research on the classification and treatment of rural household garbage in Luojiang District,Danlian County and Pujiang County of Chengdu Plain Economic Zone.Three typical models of rural MSW classification and treatment are summarized,which are mainly guided by luojiang government,co-managed by Danling villagers and actively participated by Pujiang enterprises.This paper summarizes the feasibility of the promotion experience for other rural areas of China’s rural household garbage separation model to provide reference.Based on the framework of "government guidance,villagers’ mutual assistance and market incentive",this paper focuses on the comparative analysis of the development basis,the subject’s responsibilities and rights,and the path mechanism of the sample land model.In terms of model comparison,the development basis is mainly analyzed from the perspectives of fund source channel,sanitation infrastructure and matching of villagers’ willingness behavior.The advantages of the subject’s responsibilities and rights are analyzed mainly around the subject’s coordination,applicable conditions and inter-subject responsibilities and rights.In terms of the path mechanism,it summarizes the measures and practices of management,supervision and incentive mechanism in different regions,and finally compares the benefits of the three models from the aspects of economic,social and ecological benefits.Through comparative analysis,this paper draws the following conclusions :(1)as a rural public affair,rural MSW management needs multi-subject systematic cooperation to achieve the goal.The government,villagers and enterprises should participate in the cooperation and form a good cooperation mechanism.(2)Mode selection should be combined with reality and constantly optimized.Local areas should fully consider the characteristics of local rural household garbage,local economic development level,villagers’ will and community organizations and other factors to choose the appropriate mode,at the same time,local rural household garbage management mode needs to constantly innovate to adapt to the economic and social development.(3)The implementation of household garbage management in rural areas has good economic,social and ecological benefits.