| Research purpose: After reading and collecting a lot of literature,it will help us to understand the effects of various training more comprehensively,and then design a relatively scientific and reasonable sports training method.In the experiment,different groups of subjects were measured for physical function,body shape and physical quality before and after aerobic exercise combined with resistance training and aerobic exercise.The aim is to summarize and summarize the rules of the project by comparing two different training modes and training effects(muscle building and fat loss)in order to provide students with training tips in a general sense.Research Methods: This article uses experimental methods,logical analysis methods,mathematical statistical methods,questionnaire survey methods,etc.as research methods,and selects 30 healthy students who do not have sports injuries such as muscles and joints.(non-sports majors)conducted an experimental exercise intervention.During the 12 weeks of physical training,all subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups of 15 people in each group,using aerobic training or combined aerobic resistance training as base training.Methods: Examine changes in fitness(strength,endurance),body shape(waist circumference,weight,chest circumference,BMI)and physical function(resting heart rate,vital capacity)of volunteers in different groups before and after the experience,with the aim of general Provide information to college students Provide scientific and reasonable training methods.Finally,the method of mathematical statistics is used and the statistical analysis of each index value is performed.Results:(1)After twelve weeks of experimental exercise intervention,body shape,weight,BMI,thigh circumference,and waist circumference of the combined aerobic resistance training group were significantly lower than those in the aerobic training group.Gender difference(P<0.01),but arm circumference decreased during aerobic exercise.(2)In terms of physical function,vital resistance capacity increased in combination with aerobic exercise group and aerobic exercise group(P<0.01),but there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Although the resting heart rate of both groups decreased(P < 0.01),there was no significant difference between the two groups(P > 0.05).(3)In terms of physical fitness,the aerobics group combined with resistance training and aerobic bench press,squats and non-intermittent push-ups in the exercise group all increased,but the growth rate of the aerobics combined with resistance training group was better than that of the aerobics exercise group,and there was a significant difference between the aerobic exercise group and the aerobic exercise group(P<0.05).Conclusion of the analysis:1.The weight and BMI of the combined aerobic resistance training group were significantly higher than those of the single aerobic training group.Experiments have proven that an aerobic training plan combined with resistance training has a significantly better effect on subjects’ BMI and body weight than a single aerobic training session,and that the effect of improving aerobic training combined with resistance training on body circumference is significantly better is than with simple cardio.Training.2.Although aerobics combined with a resistance training group and a single aerobic training group can improve lung capacity,during the experimental intervention 12 weeks there is no significant difference between the two groups,and the resting heart rate before and after the experiment is the same.There was a decrease but little difference between the two groups.3.The intervention effect of an aerobic combined resistance training group on bench press,squat,and non-intermittent push-ups is better than that of a single aerobic workout. |