The difficulty of adverb acquisition has been pointed out in many previous studies.Declarative adverbs is a subordinate classification of adverbs,which is different from degree adverb and state adverb.The way in which declarative adverb modifies finite predicates has nothing to do with the attribute meaning of the sentence.It is specifically used to express the subjective attitude,mood,and judgment of a speaker,such as denial,inference,and assumption.And it requires a certain echoing relationship.Therefore,it is also called echoing adverb or narrative adverb.According to previous research,the research on the acquisition of declarative adverbs has increased this year,but it has concentrated on some declarative adverbs with close relationship,such as "kitto","kanarazu" and so on.The research on the declarative adverb "betsuni" is mainly interesting in terms of structure and function,but there are few studies on acquisition.Therefore,this research takes Chinese Japanese learners as the survey object,and examines the acquisition of the declarative adverb "betsuni" through the questionnaire survey.The survey results show that Chinese Japanese learners are prone to misuse in the acquisition of the declarative adverb "betsuni".It can be said that it is difficult for Chinese Japanese learners to master the declarative adverb "betsuni".In addition,Chinese learners of Japanese mainly misapply synonymous word and co-occurrence relation.Moreover,the misuse of the co-occurrence relationship can be divided into the misuse of the co-occurrence of the auxiliary word "demo/mo",the misuse of the co-occurrence of the compound form "wakedehanai" at the end of the sentence,and the positive expression "ii" at the end of the sentence.Chinese Japanese learners do not have a sufficient understanding of the declarative adverb "betsuni".Finally,the reasons for misuse,it mainly examines the reasons for the complexity of the declarative adverb "betsuni" itself,the lack of opportunities to use it in the learners’ daily learning and life,and the insufficient explanations in textbooks. |