Administrative Particularity And Police Intervention Of Community Surveillance Video

With the development of information technology and the construction of smart communities,surveillance video has been incorporated into the residential community construction plan.The legislative process often lags behind the pace of social development.Due to the lack of corresponding legislative regulations in the construction of community surveillance video,there are no clear boundaries on the scope of construction in practice,the lack of standardized construction procedures and standards,and the ambiguity of construction subjects have caused a lot of disputes.The autonomy of residential communities does not completely exclude the intervention of the police.The function of the police has been transformed from passive governance to active prevention in order to adapt to changes in social development.The police agency’s governance of community surveillance video can effectively standardize the deficiencies in the process of surveillance video construction and management,so as to achieve a balance between pursuing public interests and protecting personal interests.From the perspective of administrative efficiency and administrative burden,it is difficult for modern administration to respond to the various needs of social development,which requires the introduction of third parties to participate in administrative actions.Community surveillance video also requires public participation by multiple subjects to improve the satisfaction and acceptability of community construction.This article starts from the problems of surveillance video in residential quarters,and combines the administrative peculiarities in the governance process of the community and the transformation of police functions to analyze the legitimacy of the police agency’s intervention in surveillance video governance in the community.At the same time,it draws on the development experience of the diversity of police administrative subjects and the privatization of administrative behaviors,in order to make normative suggestions on the governance of community surveillance video in the context of comprehensive management of big data.This article has five parts including the introduction.The introduction introduces the current situation and existing problems of community surveillance video construction and academic research viewpoints on the current situation,and discovers the research objects of the article and the practical problems that need to be solved.By reviewing related theories,we can find the starting point of this article.The second part is the problems and causes of community surveillance video.Through disputes in the real society,it introduces the main problems of community surveillance video in property management,installation subjects,operation and maintenance,and monitoring content retrieval,as well as the methods and considerations of judicial practice in facing such problems.Provide suggestions for the system construction of the following articles.The third part is the administrative peculiarities of community surveillance video.Residential communities have the characteristics of combining publicity and privacy.In the process of managing them,attention should be paid not only to the maintenance of community public order,but also to the protection of residents’ privacy.At the same time,public opinion feedback on the monitoring video governance level of residential communities on the Internet can know the level of property management in the community,help improve the level of property management,and conduct retrospective evidence collection on major public opinion events;it also helps the construction of smart communities.Provide a realistic basis for police agencies to intervene in the management of community surveillance video.The fourth part is the legitimacy of police intervention in community surveillance video.The functions of the police in various countries have generally shifted from passive prevention of danger to active danger prevention.The functions of the police are not fixed,but constantly adjusted to respond to the needs of social development.Attempt to demonstrate the particularity of the times when police agencies intervene in community video surveillance governance.Through the legal analysis of our country’s police agency’s intervention in community governance,it demonstrates its legitimacy,rationality and purpose.The fifth part is the governance path of police intervention in community surveillance video.In response to the problems in Chapter Two,I tried to respond to them with suggestions on governance norms.By putting forward specific suggestions on the construction procedures,scope,subjects,management and maintenance of community surveillance video,in order to achieve a balance between public interest maintenance and personal privacy protection.At the same time,to adapt to the development trend of diversified administrative subjects,it is recommended that the police organs manage the community surveillance video and multi-subject public cooperation to reduce the administrative burden and improve the administrative efficiency and the effect of administrative actions.