There are economic risks,stability risks,liability risks and trust risks in targeted poverty alleviation.Economic risks may be transformed into stability risks,resulting in risk dilemma.This article through to the X state gold followed in the process of poverty alleviation and development of tea industry,with B county gold tea industry poverty alleviation,G gold tea industry and J city gold tea industry as an example for poverty alleviation,the study found that different management strategies for the development of local governments to industry(completely intervene in the industry,not to interfere in industry for poverty alleviation,poverty alleviation industry convergence intervention),the results will lead to different behavior.When the local government completely intervenes the industrial development,the economic risk of the market may transform into the stability risk.When the local government does not intervene in industrial development,administrative liability risks may arise.Trust risks may arise when local governments refrain from intervening in industrial development,only take control of projects,and devolve operational autonomy to poverty-alleviation enterprises and poor farmers.According to these phenomena,the article summarizes the following causes of risk.First,the local government attaches importance to economic development and the goal of narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor;Second,the boundary conflict between government governance and social autonomy;Third,the value conflict between social welfare and procedural justice.In view of the above reasons,in order to solve the risk dilemma,it is necessary to construct the performance evaluation index system of targeted poverty alleviation by industry,formulate the system of government power list and establish the local policy buffer mechanism. |