A Comparative Study On The Reform Path Between China And India

After the Second World War,developing countries have successively gained political independence and liberation,but they are still mostly dependent on the economy.In order to oppose the power politics and economic hegemony of Western countries and gain true political and economic independence,developing countries continue to promote the development of economic sovereignty theory,and ultimately make economic sovereignty a basic principle in international law.As the two largest developing countries in the world,China and India have basically the same time of independence;after independence,they both imitated the Soviet Union and established a highly centralized planned economic system,which was implemented in the late 1970 s and early 1990 s.reform.Through comparative research,this article attempts to find the actual factors restricting the realization of economic sovereignty and the influence of the concept of economic sovereignty on the reform path of China and India.Economic sovereignty has always been an eye-catching hot issue whether it is used for theoretical research or practical application.However,there are relatively few studies on the actual factors that restrict the realization of economic sovereignty.This paper introduces the concept of national capacity and forms a new analytical framework to study the issue of China-India reform path.Through a specific comparison and analysis of the reform path of China and India,we can draw the conclusion that developing countries should regard the theory of economic sovereignty as an important tool for safeguarding national interests,and should flexibly adhere to national economic sovereignty according to specific conditions.And the national interest is turning the cart before the horse.Moreover,the prerequisite for realizing economic sovereignty is to have the necessary national capabilities,and developing countries must continue to improve basic national capabilities.