| The distribution of urban scale in China is uneven,and the difference in urban development in the region has led to unreasonable industrial layout,and the regional cultural industrial development gap is large.The cultural industry efficiency presents a clear regional imbalance.The reasonable urban scale distribution is more conducive to the effective configuration of resources,coordinating the balanced development of urban cultural industries,driving the efficiency of regional cultural industries.So find a largest city scale distribution is critical to the development of cultural industries.Based on the above problems,this paper uses China’s 27 provinces as research objects.Through the impact of China’s efficiency of cultural industries in 2013-2018,the following important studies have been found:(1)China’s urban population scale and urban density More dispersed,the size of the first city is small,and the second,third,and four major cities are small,and there is a significant multi-center flat.The cultural industrial efficiency in the region is large,in which the efficiency of cultural industries in East China has the highest efficiency,and the efficiency of cultural industries in the northeast and northwestern China has a significant aggregation characteristic of the cultural industry.(2)China’s urban scale distribution and basic negative relationship between the efficiency of cultural industries,the higher the center of urban orders,the lower the efficiency of cultural industries.The urban industrial efficiency and effective urban intensive urban spatial structure,and the more efficient efficiency of the multi-center urban cultural industry is higher,and the efficiency of the dispersed single-central urban cultural industry is low,indicating that China’s urban system has not yet The optimal distribution state is reached,but it is gradually approaching it.(3)The first level of the city is significantly negative impact on the efficiency of cultural industrial industries,and the degree of urban aggregation-dispersion is significant to the efficiency of cultural industries;at the same time,the city’s first place,city single-multi-center degree The relationship between cultural industrial efficiency presents a significant negative space spillover effect,and the urban aggregation-dispersion is significantly positive in the space space spillover effect of cultural industrial efficiency;(4)China’s east,medium and western urban first-level and cultural industrial efficiency In a significant space negative correlation;the aggregation of the city has shown a significant positive space spillover effect in the eastern part of China,and the spatial spillover effect of the central and western China in China is negative.For the mode choice of China’s urbanization development roads from the perspective of promoting the efficiency of cultural industrial efficiency,the Chinese government should consider creating a relatively fair environment by reform,so that all cities can compete on the basis of equality regardless of size,thus reducing culture Industrial efficiency loss.It should develop and cultivate multi-center urban space development models,further form a multi-center,networked urban scale distribution,which can effectively reduce the negative impact of the misseument of resources in the region on the efficiency of cultural industrial efficiency. |