"Circular Criticism" Study

"Circular Criticism",as one of the contemporary literary criticism theories,was first proposed by literary theorist Wang Xianpei in 1992.As a literary theory based on tradition,the origin and basis of its understanding come from the traditional "round culture" and "round philosophy".At the same time,the "circular criticism" advocates transcending the limitations of Chinese and Western literary theories,advocating maintaining an independent and open literary criticism mentality,and pursuing a "circular" state of criticism.The theoretical basis for the construction of circular criticism comes from three aspects.The first is to philosophically draw on the "discussion of the circle" and the meaning of philosophical meaning in classical Chinese philosophy.The related philosophical ideas of the three schools of Confucianism,Buddhism and Taoism are circular criticism.Reviews provide solid philosophical discourse support and theoretical base points,enabling it to reach the height of ontology.Secondly,culturally,there are many ancient,modern,Chinese and foreign cultures involving circle,discussion circle,and reunion,and most of them show a tendency to "shangyuan" and the consciousness of pursuing beauty.Many texts of novels,poetry and opera in classical literature pursue a kind of "round" structure and "round beauty" consciousness.In conclusion,it fits into the "circle" of the circle criticism.Extensive traceability.It is worth mentioning that the traditional Chinese view of space-time combined with the heavenly branches and the five elements of yin and yang reflects the distinctive characteristics of circular movements and the sense of upholding the circle,so it can be used as a side evidence of the circle theory.The last is to explore the origin of literary criticism,which is mainly the criticism method of circle theory in traditional literary theory,which is reflected in poems,verses,verses,comments,and various types of "circle theory" scattered in literary theory."Wen Xin Diao Long" is the focus of discussion.This includes not only Chinese literary criticism,but also a review of some Western traditional literary criticism.From the three aspects of philosophy,culture,and literary criticism,we look at the traditional theory of the circle,with a view to trace the origin of the theory of circle criticism.The characteristics and characteristics of the theory are often the embodiment of the vitality of the theory,and also the identity and growth point of its differences.The theoreticalcharacteristics of circular criticism mainly include thinking characteristics,aesthetic characteristics and method characteristics.Dialectical thinking and spiral "circle" thinking are the main thinking methods of circular criticism,which are reflected as a holistic,comprehensive,and transcendental thinking feature;aesthetic literary awareness is the focus of literary research,and circular criticism Pay attention to aesthetics,adhere to the criticism-oriented criticism,and proceed from the aesthetic consciousness of literature,in order to evoke the reader’s strong aesthetic pleasure in criticism.Therefore,circular criticism pays great attention to the shareability and transmissibility of aesthetics.It is hoped that literary criticism can be close to the readers while paying attention to the text,which greatly enhances the readable performance of literary criticism.Methodologically,circular criticism fully pays attention to the pluralism of interpretation,and insists on the criticism method which aims at the richness of literary interpretation.Both China and the West have different interpretation traditions.They originated from the Western hermeneutics of interpreting the Bible and the ancient Confucian classics.The tradition of exegesis and interpretation has formed rich interpretation resources and theoretical methods in the in-depth understanding of literary texts.Circular criticism inherits the Chinese and Western interpretation traditions.It focuses on the hierarchical analysis of the meaning of literary texts.Progressive analysis such as polyphony and proliferation makes interpretations both open and in-depth.Compared with other literary theories,circular criticism also emphasizes a kind of cycle,that is,from the "semantic cycle" to the "interpretation cycle",and advocates a kind of clever and flexible circular interpretation rules,so that literary interpretation can be used in " In the dynamics of interpretations that are not false and changeless,the cyclic interpretation method of "overview and overview" can be used to achieve the state of "round image".Of course,as a kind of literary criticism theory,"circular criticism" has always been criticized for its lack of operability.Mr.Wang Xianpei once responded to his doubts with the idea that "idea is greater than method".Questioners produce effective persuasion.Therefore,the author attempts to further construct on the basis of Wang Xianpei’s "circular criticism" in order to make up for the lack of operability of the theory.Whether it is the summary and induction of the "circle" category and concepts,or the practical experience of analyzing and analyzing works by the circle criticism can be regarded as the development of the "circle criticism".In short,the circular criticism,as a contemporary literary criticism theory based on tradition,born in China,and pursuing beyond the limits of Chinese and Western literary theories,has a great influence on both the development of literary criticism and the construction of critical theory.Theoretical value and practical significance.