Clinical Study Of Wentong Acupuncture In The Treatment Of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy Of Wind-Cold Obstruction Type

Objective: To compare two different stitch(Warming-unblocking Needling Method and Mild Reinforcing-reducing Method)treatment the curative effect of cold bizu type of cervical spondylosis of nerve root type difference,observe Warming-unblocking Needling Method treatment of cold bizu type of cervical spondylosis of nerve root type in reducing pain degree,improve the clinical symptoms,short-term curative effect of superior effect,providing a simple and practical effect and better treatment.Methods: 82 cases included in the standard cold bizu patients with cervical spondylosis of nerve root type,according to the doctor order number from 01 to 82,the 82 number import spss20.0 data statistics software,randomly divided into 2 groups,treatment group: main point line Warming-unblocking Needling Method,match point line of nourishing flat reducing method,the control line of nourishing flat reducing method,two groups of treatment of 12 times,treatment of 6 times,rest two days,six treatments.With NPQ,VAS scale score as indicators of clinical observation,judgment of two groups of baseline comparability,and then scale score before treatment and after treatment 6,12 times after rating scale before and after the comparison,observation of two kinds of stitch(Warming-unblocking Needling Method and Mild Reinforcing-reducing Method)treatment of cold bizu type of cervical spondylosis of nerve root type short-term curative effect in improving the survival quality,relieve pain,and the curative effect of differences in such aspects,and the curative effect of cervical spondylosis efficacy scale as the ultimate evaluation criteria to assess the overall efficacy of the two groups,after statistical analysis,judge whether differences statistically significantResults:1.The NPQ scores of the two groups were statistically comparable before treatment(P>0.05).After 6 sessions of treatment,NPQ scores in both groups were lower than before treatment(P<0.05),after 12 times of treatment,the NPQ score in both groups was lower than that after 6 times of treatment(P<0.05),and significantly lower than the NPQ score before treatment(P<0.01);After treatment,the NPQ scores of both groups decreased,but at different time points,the NPQ scores of the treatment group were significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).2.VAS scores of the two groups were statistically analyzed and compared before treatment(P>0.05).After 6 treatments,VAS scores in both groups were lower than before treatment(P<0.05),after 12 times of treatment,the VAS score in both groups was lower than that after 6 times of treatment(P<0.05),and significantly decreased the VAS score before treatment(P<0.01);After treatment,VAS scores in both groups decreased,but at different time points,VAS scores in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).3.After 1 course of treatment,the total effective rate of the treatment group was 95%,and the total effective rate of the control group was 87.5%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant by rank sum test(P<0.05).Conclusion:1.Both Warming-unblocking Needling Method and Mild Reinforcing-reducing Method are effective in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy(wind-cold obstruction type),but in alleviating pain,reducing accompanying symptoms,improving the quality of life of patients and short-term efficacy,Warming-unblocking Needling Method is more effective than Mild Reinforcing-reducing Method.2.The overall clinical effect of Warming-unblocking Needling Method in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy(wind-cold arthralgia type)is significantly better than that of leveling tonifying and reducing.