The Evolution Logic Of Community Owner Autonomy From The Perspective Of Power Game

With the loosening of unit organization and the advancement of market transformation,most of the communities in the city have gradually adopted professional property management,which seems to be the general trend of the times,but in reality,it is repeatedly contrary to its expectations.That is,property companies from the market field are unable to provide services to meet the needs of owners and thus "withdraw",then whether the community in the modern urban community must require the management services provided by the property companies from the market to operate,especially for some micro-community?This paper will study this issue from the perspective of power game.This paper analyzes the above phenomenon by using the H community in Hailing District of Taizhou City as the pointcut.By studying the interaction and game strategy of neighborhood committee,property company,the owners' committee and owners in the process of realizing owner's autonomy in H community,and explore how the owners' committee which wants to replace the property company to carry out the property management of the micro-community can cultivate and achieve"effective operation",so as to demonstrate whether the self-governing power represented by the owners' committee can replace the market logic of the property company to realize the professional management of the micro-community.After obtaining abundant data through in-depth interview and participant observation,all the data are logged step by step based on grounded theory.After all the generic and generic relationships are established,the core genus is classified as"The impact of game logic on governance strategies of governance subjects".The owner autonomy of H community has gone through three stages according to the data analysis.In the first stage,the participants questioned each other and adopted the game strategy of mutual attack.In the second stage,the participants begin to adjust the game strategy which is characterized by mutual compromise.In the third stage,in order to maximize their respective interests,the subjects begin to seek alignment.After the development of these three stages,the owner committee of the H community has gradually cultivated its unique market means and continuously tried and learned new governance methods,hoping to realize the specialization of property management in the community.However,the governance effect of the owner committee presents a "parabolic" profile,which is vulnerable to the impact of the"elite" of the owner committee on the monopoly of community affairs and fall into a development dilemma.The important discovery of this paper is that under certain situation the "social system" in the community can replace the property company from the market department to undertake and provide effective property management and service functions by means of "autonomy" and "self-management".In other words,the presence of property management companies does not conform to all communities.For some micro-communities,it is more important to try to mobilize and activate community social capital to provide corresponding services and property management in a low-cost and sustainable way,which may be in keeping with the governance expectations of the community.