A Practical Study On The Intervention Of Structure Family Therapy In Growth Crisis Of The Left-Behind Kids

With deep development of our country's reform and openning-up and the abolishment of household registration systerm,the peasant workers,as a part of urban industrial labor,have been a special group and meanwhile,their kids have been another special group,the left-behind child,who are easily in growth crises,which show up as the problems of guardianship,parent-child attachment,socialization,mental health,morality,study and crime.These problems have a profound effect on the development of the left-behind child and the society.This study uses Structure family therapy as a means of intervention,taking a teenager,who was in growth crisis,to carry out social work service object.The goals of the social work service are to explore the effects of Structure family therapy when being applied to handle the growth crisis of left-behind child,reflect on the advantages and disadvantages of the Structural family therapy,and provide references for the practice of intervening the growth-crisis of the left-behind child.In the course of intervening the growth-crisis of the client,I aimed at mainly on the growth crisis of the client which showed as the relation of parenthood alienation,the client's crisis of Psychologically vulnerable,sensitive and low self-esteem,the client's poor interpersonal skills and the custody misconducts,under the guide of Structure family therapy.Structural-family-treatment,which is made up of certain basic hypotheses and steps,is mainly used to solve different problems caused by unhealthy family structure,so the client's growth crises were seen as the result of his mobid family structure.So the service aims to rebuild the family structure.The healthy family structure is beneficial to guaranteeing the educational,affectional and protective functions of the family,which not only can provide support for client's growth and help him work through the growth crisis,but also it can help the family adapt to circumstances change,thereby increasing the client's capacity to solve the problems.The intervention of process,in retrospect,has impressed on me its complexity,which makes me realize my deficiency to be a professional social work.I think this study falls short in several aspects,including the shallow of understanding the Structure family therapy,which makes the sevice not very efficient;the constraints of Structure family therapy,ignoring the rural community's evironment,which also dose matter for client's growth;the poorly preparation I had made,which led the study to a lack of pretest of the family function.