A Comparison Of Consistency Between Junior Middle School Textbooks Function Exercises And Curriculum Standard

In 2001,the Ministry of Education issued Outline of Basic Education Curriculum Reform(trial).(Short for Outline of Curriculum Reform)pointed out,the national curriculum standard is the basis of compiling teaching materials,teaching,assessment and examination as well as management and evaluation of courses.Based on the background of the global curriculum reform under the curriculum standard,People pay more and more attention to the guiding role of curriculum standard of textbook compilation,teaching evaluation and examination.Thus,curriculum standard consistency issues are important and become an important part of the curriculum research.Exercise are important parts of textbooks,they are the connotation and extension of classroom knowledge.Equipped with reasonable or not,alignment with curriculum standard or not,which directly impact on teachers' teaching quality and student'learning efficiency.Thefore,study of alignment between textbook exercises and curriculum standards has a practical value.There are certain instruction function for arranges homework,textbook compilation and so onThis text took exercises in PEP(People's Education Press)and Hunan version junior mathematics textbook function exercises as the object.It discusses the alignment between two textbook function exercises and curriculum standards from content themes and cognitive processes.First of all,carefully study the curriculum standards,analysis of the two versions textbook'function exercises.Secondly,combined with the research contentd and based on the new classification of Bloom's target and SEC consistency analysis model,Construct two-dimensional of contents themes × cognitive process,then present the coding results in the frame table.Finally,using SPSS 16.0,EXCEL,MATLAB software to process data,Compare and analyze the alignment between two versions textbook function exercises and curriculum standards by making use of research methods such as Statistics,literature analysis and so on.Draw the following conclusions:1.The distribution of two versions textbook function exercises in contents themes dimension are roughly consistent with the curriculum standard,only a small part of the difference;2.The distribution of Hunan versions textbook function exercises in cognitive process is more in line with the requirements of curriculum standards,and achieves higher cognitive level exercise more than PEP;3.Two versions of the function exercises and curriculum standards are not attaches great importance to the knowledge of analysis,evaluation and creation;4.In this text both PEP and Hunan Edition textbook function exercises have statistically significant alignment with the curriculum standard,above the 0.05 level;5.Using the SEC model consistency formulas (?) calculate the consistency index,found that Hunan versions'consistency index higher than PEP.As a whole,the level of consistency between Hunan Education Press textbook and curriculum standard is better than that PEP.