Tong Shuye And Three Orientations Of Researching Ancient History In The Republic Of China

In the conflict and inheritance of tradition and modern times,and the collision and fusion of middle school and western learning,history is in a comprehensive transition.New trends in the study of ancient history during the Republic of China also appeared.In 1935,Feng Youlan put forward the theory of "believing ancients,doubting ancients,and explaining ancients".The ancients believed that all ancient books were true and had no doubt about them;the suspected ancients,on the contrary,believed that the ancient books contained untrustworthy;The ancient ancient school is not as good as the ancient school to believe in the ancient books,nor is it that the ancient ancient school has completely overturned the legends of ancient history.Both the doubtful ancients,the ancients and the ancients,have made considerable contributions to the transformation of research methods and paradigms of Chinese ancient history in the first half of the twentieth century.Tong Shuye that grew up in this academic environment has a bumpy life experience,and its academic style is also rich and colorful.The style and the brand of the times have become a new generation of scholars.Tong Shuye is a rising star of the ancient history discriminating school.On the basis of inheriting Gu Jiegang,it has further developed.He explained and demonstrated Gu's suspicious ancient theory,corrected some of Gu Jiegang's mistakes in discerning ancient antiquities,and promoted and improved "The concept of ancient history caused by layers "unifies the"layer theory "with Yang Kuan's" myth evolution differentiation theory ".In the 1930s,Tong Shuye worked hard in a difficult environment.He absorbed the advantages of Haipai scholarship and focused on new trends in academic development.Debates with historical scholars,discusses ancient history and legends,primitive society,and methods and attitudes to the study of prehistory,reflecting the interpretation of both myths and legends,the use of false historical materials,and the theoretical basis for building ancient history.On the basis of criticizing historical materialism,Tong Shuye gradually reflects,absorbing the historical view to treat history a bit,interpreting history with an economic history view,and getting rid of the political history model ofGu Jiegang's "Lecture Notes on Spring and Autumn".In the early period,the Nangao scholars had a fierce debate with Gu Jigang and other suspected ancient schools.Tong Shuye also confronted them.They had different views on issues such as the "Three Emperors and Five Emperors" and "Yu".They have different pursuits of the essence of history and their academic style It's different.Tong Shuye is committed to the study of Pre-Qin history.The ancient history legend and the exploration of the history of the Western Zhou Spring and Autumn Period are his main achievements in history.Although he originated from the ancient history disciplinary school,he was deeply influenced by the context of the times in the process of studying and treating ancient history,and appeared different "faces."There are criticisms and reflections on the study of ancient history of the historical view school.It has played a role of correcting and correcting the study of the ancient history of Nan Gao scholars,and formed a unique history.Tong Shuye integrates the three stages of "doubtful archeology,archeology,and interpretation of the ancient",and has entered the "new Songology" from the "new sinology".Its "entanglement and entanglement" with different scholars on the issue of ancient history has made the children's book industry The study of ancient history reflects intriguing ideological and cultural expressions in modern academic history.