| Objective:System to review the research progress of ancient and modern physicians to cough after infection,combining with the characteristics of dongguan infection after the onset of cough,cough after preliminary reveals the wind dry pathogens and infection of etiology and pathogenesis of correlation,selection of old Chinese medicine Liu Shi jian with breeze cough runfei method to experience,observation after the treatment of infection improved the symptoms of cough,from the perspective of multiple score to assess their effectiveness,for the Chinese medicine treatment of infection after cough to provide more of the French medicine basis and clinical data.Methods:Choose between December 2017 and January 2018 in guangzhou university of Chinese medicine affiliated hospital of dongguan emergency clinic infection after coughing(wind dry lung injury certificate)of 100 cases of patients,according to 1:1 comparison principle is divided into control group(50 cases)and group(50 cases)for clinical treatment,control group simply gives the western medicine,beauty(oxygen compound armor that Ming capsule)oral,patients in the control group on the basis of given to breeze runfei medicinal broth of traditional Chinese medicines for the treatment,treatment for 7 days,Observation records in the two groups to see a doctor the day before(treatment),3 and 7 days after treatment discontinuation and 7 days of cough symptoms,Chinese medicine symptom integral,quality of life assessment of efficacy test,using SPSS25.0 statistical analysis,compare the treatment effect of the two groups,objective evaluation breeze cough runfei method treatment after infection levels of clinical efficacy.Results:1.Baseline comparability:before treatment,the differences in gender,age and baseline score between the experimental group and the control group were not statistically significant(P>0.05),which was comparable.2.Cough symptom score comparison:cough symptom score of the control group for 3 days was not statistically significant(P<0.05),and cough symptom score for 7 days of treatment and 7 days of withdrawal was statistically significant(P<0.05).The scores of cough symptoms in the experimental group after 3 days of treatment,7 days of treatment and 7 days of withdrawal were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were statistically significant differences in cough symptom scores between the experimental group and the control group at 3 days of treatment,7 days of treatment and 7 days of withdrawal(P<0.05),and the experimental group was better at improving cough symptom scores.3.Comparison of TCM syndromes scores:the scores of TCM syndromes in the control group after 3 days of treatment were not statistically significant(P<0.05),while the scores of TCM syndromes after 7 days of treatment and after 7 days of withdrawal were statistically significant(P<0.05).The scores of TCM syndromes in the experimental group were statistically different after treatment for 3 days,7 days and 7 days(P<0.05).The scores of TCM symptoms in the treatment group for 3 days,7 days of treatment,and 7 days after withdrawal were statistically significant between the two groups(P<0.05),and the scores of improving TCM symptoms in the test group were better than those in the control group.4.Comparison of LCQ scores:compared with that before treatment,the mean LCQ score of the control group for 3 days was not statistically significant(P.<0.05),while the mean LCQ score for 7 days and 7 days after drug withdrawal was statistically significant(P<0.05).The mean LCQ score of the experimental group was statistically different from that before treatment(P<0.05).The life quality questionnaire scores of leicester cough after 3 days of treatment,7 days of treatment and 7 days of withdrawal were compared respectively.The mean value of the test group was higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The test group was more able to improve the life quality of patients.5.Comparison of clinical efficacy:After 7 days of treatment,the clinical efficacy was compared with the integral effect of cough and TCM symptoms.The total effective rate of cough symptoms was 90.0%in the experimental group and 74.0%in the control group.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).The total effective rate of the experimental group was 92.0%,and that of the control group was 76.0%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).6.Comparison of curative effect of single symptom of traditional Chinese medicine:after 7 days of treatment,there was a statistical difference between the two groups in improving the curative effect of dry mouth(P<0.05),and the effective rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group;There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in improving the effect of pharyngeal itching(P<0.05),and the experimental group was higher than the control group.7.Comparison of drug safety:during the study period,there were no common adverse drug reactions such as skin rashes and itching in the experimental group and the control group,and no significant abnormal increase in laboratory safety indicators(blood routine,liver and kidney function,etc.)before and after treatment.Therefore,the two groups of drugs can be considered to be safe treatment.Conclusion:Both the experimental group and the control group were able to improve,the patients’ clinical symptoms in the treatment of post-infection cough,and the experimental group was better than the control group.Traditional Chinese medicine with shufeng runfei as the treatment method can improve the treatment effect of post-infection cough,can further reduce the cough,dry mouth,pharyngeal itching symptoms of patients with post-infection cough of wind-dryness lung syndrome,improve the quality of life of patients,is an effective method of traditional Chinese medicine for post-infection cough,can be used in clinical syndrome differentiation. |
