Font Size: a A A

Advantages Of Microscope Assisted Anterior Cervical Approach For Cervical Spondylosis

Posted on:2019-05-16Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y C LinFull Text:PDF
GTID:2394330545491961Subject:Surgery
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Through the comparative analysis of microscope assisted anterior cervical and discectomy and cage implant bone fusion and titanium plate fixation(experimental group)and conventional cervical spine surgery(control group)the clinical curative effect and patient satisfaction in the treatment of cervical spondylosis.Evaluate the advantages of microscope assisted minimally invasive surgery,to promot the promotion of the operation and bring benefit to patients.Methods:collecting the clinical data of 131 patients with microscope assisted anterior cervical and discectomy and cage bone fusion and titanium plate fixation in our hospital during October 2017 to October 2010.Through the retrospective analysis of the test group(group A)and control group(group B)with 1)preoperative and postoperative JO A score,2)operation time,3)Intraoperative bleeding,4)incision length and width,5)the duration of hospitalization,6)hospitalization expenses,7)blood hemogram recovery time comparison in price(hemoglobin,neutrophil)showed that the differences in clinical efficacy between the two groups of patients with postoperative follow-up was compared after satisfaction questionnaire score.The statistical software SPSS19.0 used in the study.Results and conclusion:operative time,operative incision Vancouver score,hospitalization time,hospitalization expenses and patient satisfaction are significantly different from those of conventional surgery,and the difference is significant(P<0.05).It is suggested that microscope assisted effect is better than conventional surgery for the same segment disease.The less lesion segment,the higher clinical efficacy and satisfaction,and the more reliable surgical treatment under microscope.
Keywords/Search Tags:Microscopes, cervical spondylosis, spinal implants, patient satisfaction, clinical efficacy
PDF Full Text Request
Related items