Study On Types Of Preferential Agricultural Policy Executing

Based on the relevant theories of public policy implementation,this paper uses the literature method,case study,comparative analysis and other research methods,takes the rural preferential policies as the research object,selects the rural minimum living security system,the farmers’ direct subsidy and the Microfinance as the analysis object,focuses on the implementation of the three policies in the village S,and finally has a comparative analysis of the execution type of the three kinds of preferential treatment of agricultural.The implementation of the rural minimum living security system in the village S belongs to the mechanical execution,which is "only similar in the form,not similar in the spirit." Effected by the "no trouble" administrative logic,"take the form" behavior logic and "no guilty" local logic,the village cadres in the selection,examination and exit,on one hand follow the rules carefully,execute the policies as the requirements of the document,adhere to the principle of policy;while on the other hand,they show the “Dare not to do” in the implementation of the policy,they do not solve the specific problems flexibly according to the every famer’s individuality in practice.Because of the implementation of the direct subsidy policy of grain growers is a huge project,and the village cadres have lost the authority to restrict the behavior of the peasants after the rural tax reform,the village cadres will be perfunctory in order to complete the tasks on time.It is a kind of the symbolic execution,which performance as: the objects of subsidy are not consistent with grain growers;the behavior famers gain more subsidies by cheating the varieties and areas are not be limited;the way of subsidy and redemption is poor,and the time and amount of subsidy are not clear to the farmers;the rise of the agricultural capital price offset the subsidy income of farmers,so its influence on increasing production inputs and improving planting is limited.As for Microfinance policy,the application procedure and the loan quota does not matched with the demand of farmers;the loan amount cannot meet the requirement of the large grain production famers;and the rural credit cooperatives is lending discreetly in case of the credit risk.As a result,the willingness to credit is very weak in the village S,the specific promotion process is more difficult,there is a few applicants every year,and the most of money will be used for their children to school or marriage,the loans uses single,which failed to achieve our country’s policy goal,to promote the Microfinance.This policy implementation process belongs to overhead execution.Through the comparative analysis of the implementation of the three kinds of preferential agricultural policies,the author believes that from the aspect of system design,the rural minimum living security policy aims to guarantee the minimum living standard of poor farmers,is a social policy;the farmers’ direct subsidy policy and Microfinance policy focus on driving rural economic growth,are economic policies,while the scope of application of the three policies are not the same.In terms of practice,mechanical execution,symbolic execution and overhead execution deviate from the policy objectives in different degrees and departure from the policy content,but these three kinds of policy implementation methods also show different characteristics.In terms of the deviation causes,the policy program itself,the policy execution subject,the policy execution object and other factors have a direct impact on the specific implementation of the three policies.