| Punishments in social dilemma researches can be divided into altruistic punishment and antisocial punishment. Antisocial punishment is a kind of punishment towards collaborators,which is a behavior of "punishing people who contribute more". Altruistic punishment promotes cooperation behavior in social dilemma, while antisocial punishment inhibits such cooperation behavior.The dilemma of helping others is a kind of social dilemma. The dilemma of helping others is a kind of social dilemma. Individuals provide help to others, but do not obtain immediate profits, while individual benefits will even be sacrificed. However, seen from the long run, the dilemma of helping others is conducive to forming a kind of interdependent descriptive social norm. The stronger the descriptive social norm is, the bigger the possibility that individuals can gain assistance when they are in need of help in the future is. Namely, everyone helps others and everyone is helped. In recent years,there emerge massive amount of antisocial punishment behaviors in Chinese society,which severely influences the behavior of helping others in the dilemma of helping others.In recent years, there appear a lot of antisocial punishments, which severely influences the behavior of helping others in the dilemma of helping others.It is discovered that a lot of factors are related to antisocial punishment, including individual factor and social environment factor, among which, it is considered that the intense degree of environment competition and cost to impact in antisocial punishment have great influences on antisocial punishment behaviors. Though simulating the dilemma of helping others in life, the influences of different competition environments and cost to impact on antisocial punishment behaviors are explored. Besides, third-party punishment is introduced, with a view to intervene antisocial punishment behaviors in the dilemma of helping others.The first experiment adopts two-factor multilevel between-subjects design of 3(C/I<1 ; C/I=1 ; C/I>1) x 2 (highly competitive environment; less competitive environment) to research the influences of different competitive environments and cost to impact on antisocial punishment behaviors. The experimental result show that the main effect of cost to impact on antisocial punishment behaviors is remarkable; the smaller the C/I specific value is, the more the subject antisocial punishment behaviors are; the main effect of competitive environments on antisocial punishment behaviors is not remarkable,but in less competitive environments, the number of subject antisocial punishment behaviors is greater than that of subject antisocial punishment behaviors in highly competitive environments; the interaction effect between competitive environments and cost to impact is not significant.The second experiment adopts two-factor multilevel between-subjects design of 2(75% punishment probability; 25% punishment probability) x 2 (money punishment;social punishment) to research the influences of different punishment patterns of third-party punishment and different punishment probabilities on subject antisocial punishment behaviors. The experimental result indicates that a third-party punishment plays a good role in inhibiting antisocial punishment behaviors in the dilemma of helping others; punishment patterns’ main effect on antisocial punishment behaviors is remarkable; compared with money punishment, social punishment can more effectively reduce antisocial punishment behaviors; the main effect of punishment probability on antisocial punishment behaviors in the dilemma of helping others is not remarkable; the interaction effect between punishment patterns and punishment probability is not significant. |
PDF Full Text Request