Analysis Of The World Maritime Power Of Maritime Transport Service Trade Efficiency

Maritime is the main mode of transport of international trade in goods,this article will consider maritime trade services of the United States, France, Germany, Japan, Italy, Britain, South Korea, Singapore, Spain, China as the analysis target, according to the maritime trade service input and output in economic implications, the paper select DEA model as the research methods of the article. According to industry factors·Michael Porter "diamond model" theory of production conditions, relevant support and influence to select paper input variables, including the total amount of import and export trade, port container throughput, average international oil prices, currency exchange rates.After the reform and opening up, China ushered in the era of rapid development of foreign trade. The rapid development of Chinese maritime trade services since2001to join WTO,2001China’s total import and export of seaborne trade in services＄8.907billion, in2011China’s total seaborne trade in services for＄87.038billion, China’s total import and export of seaborne trade in services grew by9.77times. Among them, particularly rapid growth in2003,China’s total import and export growth in seaborne trade in services reached56.75%. With China’s accession to WTO commitments progressive realization of the conditions, the degree of openness of the Chinese shipping industry continues to improve, in the case of Chinese maritime trade in services is relatively uncompetitive, China’s maritime services trade deficit from＄4.883billion in2001increased to2011the＄39.85billion, maritime services trade deficit trend continues to expand.Through state of the world maritime trade in services data were summarized maritime power system and combined with the ten countries shipping services trade efficiency study found that from2001to2010data show that the United States total maritime trade in services export share of world maritime trade in services export more than10%of the total. In contrast, China’s total import and export of maritime trade in services accounted for1.26percent of the world’s total maritime trade in services imports and exports in2001, China’s total import and export of maritime trade in services accounted for2.39percent of the world’s total maritime trade in services imports and exports in2010, nearly10years China maritime trade in services grew nearly doubled, but with respect to the absolute number of China’s total import and export growth, absolute total seaborne trade and export growth is relatively slow service.In this paper, DEAP2.1statistical software, establish DEA model, focusing on the efficiency of world maritime trade in services between the maritime powers for comparative analysis. I think maritime trade service efficiency study the possibility exists, the data show that the world’s maritime trade in services with the development trend of the world economy presents the basic trend in the same direction, especially the United States financial crisis from2009through analysis of data were observed since, the world’s total import and export trade with the world’s maritime imports and exports of goods and services trade declined simultaneously. According to the2003-2010Baltic Dry bulk shipping freight index BDI market analysis and oil prices, along with the international maritime transport prices will rise in international oil prices and rising international oil prices can be seen in the development of international maritime trade and services are relevant. For the same country in different years and different countries in the same year the impact of exchange rate changes on maritime trade services research, we can see the development of a stable currency exchange rate plays an important role in maritime trade service. Developed based on data directly observed little port container throughput, however, the total import and export of the country’s maritime trade in services is very large, indicating that the developed countries on the maritime trade port container throughput service contribution rate than China.I find the proportion of own-ship carrying much higher than in developed countries to China. For the same country in different years and different countries in the same year impact of maritime trade port container throughput services to be DEA study comparing the ten countries to remove China, other countries, South Korea’s maritime services and port container throughput volume of trade has increased or decreased direct positive relationship, China, South Korea based on comparative analysis of data shows that the port container throughput growth is not directly translate into growth in maritime trade in services, the reason is imperfect national maritime system, the lack of the most direct system of national shipping company protection.This article selected the four input variables are the total import and export cargo, port container throughput, international exchange rates, international average oil prices, respectively, China and nine countries in2005,2008,2009,2010years of data for analysis, find that nine countries shipping services integrated technology trade efficiency is much stronger than China. Through four years of China’s maritime trade data service on the above analysis, China efficiency of maritime trade services continues to increase. According DEAP2.1statistical software efficiency analysis, China can learn from Japan’s maritime laws and regulations, the development experience of the United States and western maritime services in developed countries. By analyzing the DEA output-oriented model, Britain,France and United States in2008,2010DEA effective; other maritime powers are DEA invalid DEA model; China in2005,2008,2009, between2010four overall efficiency value DMU are less than ten countries selected average overall efficiency value.