The Study Of Incomplete Volumes Of <Bian Zhu>

The books of Sui Dynasty in the history of Chinese ancient books occupied the transitional position. <Bian Zhu> as a component of the Sui Dynasty books play a unique role. However, since the Qing Dynasty Gao Shiqi found it, represented by ministers in charge of the literature in the government, most of the academic experts think this book is a fake. As a result, the Qing Dynasty experts collecting and collating ancient books of text have no use of it, that make its literature value has not been fully mining and reasonable positioning. This text to distinguish true and false of the book is as the basis, thus textual research on the book’s compiling, the referenced poetry and the works of Han Dynasty pay attention to the Gorgeous language and the dual, as well as geographic works. In the research, using the literature value of the book to prove the truth of it.This article is divided into two parts of the introduction and main text, the introduction introduces the basic situation of <Bian zhu>, including evaluation for it and the research results, as well as it has such a value of collecting contrasting and collating ancient books of text. That is to say, this article expatiates the significance and feasibility.Text is the main part of the paper, First of all,it refute those people who represented by ministers in charge of the literature in the government, they think,<Bian Zhu> is a fake.In terms of theory, because the phenomenon of "ancient books appeared in modern times" and does not directly address the emperor name problem of man-made factors, makes the <Bian zhu> has the possibility of the existence of such a ancient books, and that involves the direct use of the word " Guang " may be not directly call the emperor’s do not pay attention to the name or the posterity will be caused by the change back to the original text. In terms of bibliographic description, the academic experts think the <Song Zhi> first description <Bian Zhu>, the idea that has a problem. For verification, before that there have been books has carried on the description to it, and the volume problem is there are differences. From the content of the book, there are text that can collect, and their source are the precious rare books. And <Bian zhu> involved in <Yue Fu Jie Ti> should be written as early as the tang dynasty Wu Jing’s <Yue Fu Jie Ti>. So, from the content value can be sure the book exists at the time. From the point of circulating situation and book version, <Bian zhu> to see in the world, not Gao Shiqi one discovery, nor a make private copies. Can see today, however, is the publishing version of Gao Shiqi. From the point of the author’s life, Du Gongzhan pursuit a former sui dynasty writing office is for bookmaking. Therefore, imperial version called <Bian zhu> is a faking is an oversight.Secondly, analyses the book’s compiling. Look from the category division, <Bian zhu> embodies the "heaven, earth and people" the unity of the three ideas, and this is the order and social ideology and its systematic mode of thinking in ancient China. Look from the compiling, because of its books before incomplete, did not see completely, it is difficult to compare. And subsequent books, such as <Bei Tang Shu Chao>、<Chu Xue Ji> and so on, to its mutual reference, antithesis things such as citation method is of reference, this is more evidence about the role of it in the history books can not be replaced.Finally, the referenced poetry and dual language with rich class products and geographical separately of <Bian Zhu> carried on the textual research, has compiled <Bian Zhu> is only a reference to the text: one of poetry class, fifteen of dual language with rich class products article, thirty of geographic works without collection, and no collection of several text. Through such comb, not only to recognize the way of <Bian Zhu> citation, and further from the literature value of content must be the truth of the book.