| In 2011, it is a big leap in the history of tennis in China. Born in Asia, one of the first won the highest level of tennis competition is Li Na. She created a miracle, refreshed the history, let people have a deeper understanding of tennis, and promoted the development of China’s Tennis Sport. What’s more, more and more people have begun to realize and focus on Li this particularly wonderful flower of Tennis around the world.Before that, a lot of people think playing good tennis must be tall, as are advantage, this is traditionally right, but it is not absolute. By the French Open Tennis Tournament in 2011 and the 2013 Australian Open, we can study that Li and Miria Sharapova to find out the advantages and disadvantages from their tactics, physical fitness and psychological quality. Based on that, it gives us the direction of the need to improve, we deeply know what tennis is nowadays and understand where female tennis player technology development rules are going, which not only helps us to grasp the development trend of world women’s tennis players in training in the future, but strengthens ourselves to focus on our own weakness and improve skills.This paper uses the literature material method, comparison method, observation method, aiming at the French Open Tennis tournament in 2011 and Australian Open in 2013 to analysis why Li won the game from the tactics, body shape, psychological quality, physical fitness and playing style. Here are reasons:No.1 The Body Conditions: Li is 15 cm shorter and 5kg heavier than Sharapova. According to the normal situation, Sharapova’s body condition is better, but Li’s footwork is quite fast, coordinatedWith stop motion is very rapid. In the game, Maria because of her height, she moved up not flexibly as well as Li did, many times she needed to rescue the ball with her long arms while failed to reach the designated position.No.2 Physical quality aspect: Li and Maria Sharapova’s physical quality is pretty good in the female tennis, in the two games both sides did not reach their own limit. Li and Maria are not the person to give up easily, in the other games, when the physical strength has reached its limits, they will still try to save every ball as their best.No.3 Psychological quality aspect: In the two games, Li’ mentality kept better than Maria’s, handling most of balls well, hang on to the pitch of the initiative. Maria Sharapova’s mistake and unforced errors she made can be seen as much as her psychological fluctuation is bigger, have been overruled by Li.No.4 Play style: Li and Maria both are good at bottom line offensive. Comparing with Maria’s play style, Li’s is relatively more exquisite, thinking more clearly, so the initiative was controlled by Li, and then won the game.No.5 In the serve technology: In the two games, Li’s serve was more conservative than Sharapova’s, whether the first or second to serve, the ball serving speed was big different between Li and Maria, Li’s serving speed was faster, stability was higher, as well as the serve serves. Li was used to playing the ball to the opponent inner side, but Maria liked to serve the ball to the opponent’s backhand and direct approach. In the 2013 Australian Open, Sharapova serving placement change was bigger, the more tend to the opponent’s hand position in the game.No.6 In receiving technology: in the 2011 French open, li na in the first receiving every higher than sharapova, second receiving a little worse than sharapova.In the 2013 Australian open, li’s first service first and the second serve serves are higher than sharapova.No.7 on the forehand and backhand winner points: two games, li na is more aggressive than sharapova, both winners forehand and backhand winner, obviously higher than that of many opponents.No.8 Hit the ball in the net technology link: li’s tennis ball technology is relatively less than sharapova, two games are no serves high maria sharapova in the net. |
PDF Full Text Request