| In2012, the China Tennis Open women’s competition lineup is moreluxury than any previous session, and one Grand Slam match, the top47players in WTA rankings all arrived in Beijing, finals were held between thefirst player and the second one in the world. Sharapova’s achievements in the2012is also very significant, and she regained the first in the world after209weeks, online has also been runner-up in the year2012.Through on2012China tennis open, Sharapova with opponent technology comparison researchfound Sharapova with opponent exists of advantages and shortcomings andwhere they need to improve, so that understanding deeply for the excellentwoman players of technology development rules in the world of tennis. Tograsp the trend of the world woman tennis technology development is fortennis players in future of training in the strengthened in competition in theexposed out of weaknesses of improved and exercises provides has a strongand reliable of pursuit, also for players Li Na, and Zheng Jie and Peng Shuai,when they meet Maria Sharapova’s game one day, it can provide some help.This paper shows2012China Open tennis six matches, which happenedbetween Maria Sharapova and her opponents for the study withdocumentation methods, video observation of statistical methods, statisticalanalysis and comparative study on body shape, serving technique, then theyserve, bottom line before the technology and network technologies forcomparative analysis, the results are as follows:1. Maria Sharapova at the highest height, arm span is relatively long,retaining the ball after a relatively large range, so she is relatively high at thepoint of hitting the ball, which would occupy a huge advantage, similarlyNET block scope are considerable advantages, Sharapova’s index, description of Sharapova muscle strength development and body tissue density is not verygood.2. The conclusions of the five rounds before Sharapova won:1) Servingtechniques, a high success rate, win rates and higher win rates. Serve on theimpact point, Sharapova first serve points compared with an average, it isdifficult to let your opponent guess tee placement and intent, the secondserving dominated by opponent’s backhand, avoiding the opponent’s hand tostorm.2) The methods in return a link, whether receiving the ball on win rate,is also on the number of service break, Sharapova had a huge advantage.Receiving the ball back onto the ball, Sharapova dominated by aggressivebackhand drive, to minimize return forced the situation.3) In the bottom lineon the pros and cons of hitting the hand techniques, Sharapova is veryproactive, offensive or strong both for winning more hands, she can bettercontrol the proportion of non-forced errors. On the front and back hand shot,is mainly based on backhand drive.4) Come to the net on the technical aspectsonly and Li Na in the semi-finals, Sharapova NET technology is less than LiNa, in comparison with the other players, Sharapova NET scoring techniquehas the absolute advantage.3. Sharapova lost in finals:1) Serving segment, whether it is a success,also a win rate and second win rates, Sharapova is significantly lower thanrivals. Serving placement on the reasonable distribution, in the advantageCourt serving placement compared to a single, especially the second,essentially is full width, so that they see them serving easily intentions.2) Themethods in return a link, whether receiving the ball on win rate, is also on thenumber of service break, Sharapova ‘s card is lower on the efficiency ofthe break points.3) In the bottom line on the pros and cons hitting the handtechniques, active winning more points than Azarenka cards to Sharapova, thepros and cons of his attacks stronger, but Sharapova the pros and cons ofnon-forced too many unforced errors, hitting were not enough stable.4)Azarenka card keenly controlled the ball in Sharapova’s backhand, but there isa few opportunities to play a strong hand for Sharapova herself. |
PDF Full Text Request