The Clinical Curative Effect Study Of Arthroscopic Debridement Combine With "Wash、press And Supply" Treatment In Treating Knee Osteoarthritis

Objective:To compare study the clinical effect of arthroscopic debridement combine with routine treatment and “wash、press and supply”treatment in treating Knee Osteoarthritis.Method:Using randomized method,we have collected 47 cases to bring into this research from Oct.2013 to Oct.2015.According to randomized controlled principle divide into groups.During the research cases,there are 23 cases in the observation group,24 cases in the control group.During the observation process,as the incomplete data 、 poor doctor’s advice、case fall off etc,we only have had 20 cases in the observation group、20 cases in the control group.So,finally,we have had statisticsed and analyzed 40 cases data to research the clinical therapeutic effect of arthroscopic debridement combine with routine treatment and “wash、massage and supply”treatment in treating Knee Osteoarthritis.Result:1 The curative effect analysis of observation group and control group in treating Knee OsteoarthritisFrom the total curative effect analysis(table6),after the treatment of observation group and control group,we have knew that:The total curative effect analysis of the two groups’ HSS scoring system,the effective rate of the observation group is 95%,the effective rate of the control group is 90%.From the rank sun test analysis(Z=-2.031,P=0.042<0.05),we have knew that the observation group is different from control group,the total treatment efficiency of observation group is higher than the control group.2 The comparative analysis of main symptoms of before and after the treatment of observation groupFrom the comparative analysis of main symptoms(table7),before and after the treatment of observation group,we have knew that:Using the T test to test the HSS scoring system data:The observation group have the extremely significant difference in improving the pain、function、activity degree、muscle strength 、 flexion contracture of the knee(p<0.01).There is no significant differences in improving stability of knee joint.3 The comparative analysis of main symptoms of before and after the treatment of control groupFrom the comparative analysis of main symptoms(table8),before and after the treatment of control group,we have knew that:Using the T test to test the HSS scoring system data:The control group have the extremely significant difference in improving the pain、function、flexion contracture of the knee(p<0.01).There have significant differences in improving activity degree、muscle strength of the knee(P<0.05).There is no significant differences in improving stability of knee joint.4 The comparative analysis of main symptoms of after the treatment of observation group and control groupFrom the comparative analysis of main symptoms(table9), after the treatment of observation group and control group,we have knew that:Using the T test to test the HSS scoring system data during after the treatment of observation group and control group : after the treatment of two groups have the extremely significant difference in improving activity degree of the knee(p<0.01).There have significant differences in improving pain 、 flexion contracture of the knee(P<0.05).There is no significant differences in improving function、stability、muscle strength of knee(P>0.05).Conclusion:The total curative effect analysis of the two groups’ HSS scoring system,the effective rate of the observation group is 95%,the effective rate of the control group is90%.From the rank sun test analysis(Z=-2.031,P=0.042<0.05),we have knew that the observation group is different from control group,the total treatment efficiency of observation group is higher than the control group.Using the T test to test the HSS scoring system data during after the treatment of observation group and control group : after the treatment of two groups have the extremely significant difference in improving activity degree of the knee(p<0.01).There have significant differences in improving pain 、 flexion contracture of the knee(P<0.05).There is no significant differences in improving function、stability、muscle strength of knee(P>0.05).In total,the “wash、press and supply”treatment after Arthroscopic debridement in treating Knee Osteoarthritis to improve the main symptoms of pain 、 activity degree、 flexion contracture 、stiff are more better than the routine treatment after arthroscopic debridement.