Clinical Research On The Treatment Of Total Knee Arthroplasty Perioperative Joint Functional Recovery With Three-Six Methods Manipulation

Purpose: In order to evaluate the clinical value and feasibility,we make the research about the clinical efficacy of TKA in peri operation period.According to the results of the research,we explore its mechanism and compare observation of massage, the final progress is to improve the function of knee joint.Method: According to the research,we divide all the patients who have a total of 90 into three groups. The control group purely adapt CPM treatment.On the basis of the control group, the treatment group combined three-six methods with CPM for treatment.After the medical measures,we combine the information and assess them,including the HSS scores,ROM value and VAS value analysis,finally,we have to have a evaluation of pain and observe its clinical therapeutic effect,comparing them.Result: The three groups of patients with perioperative HSS total score comparison, preoperative and postoperative 1 day 2 days, P > 0.05, there was no statistically significant difference. But the treatment group compared with preoperative 1 day on admission, HSS score increase is larger than the control group and the control group B. HSS score 7 and 14 days after three groups, P < 0.01, suggesting that three groups in postoperative 1 week and have significant difference,after 2 weeks,HSS score of the patients have statistical significance. but the treatment group and control group by A technique of intervention therapy of traditional Chinese medicine, knee joint activity more than on admission. After two days to 14 days after the results of the analysis, the difference is significant. About the pain,three groups of patients with pain VAS value comparison, P < 0.05, the difference is statistically significant, suggesting the three groups of patients were improved with postoperative pain. the treatment group effect of analgesia is better than the control group and the control group B. Analysis of the average hospitalization days of three groups of patients can be seen, P < 0.01, there are significant difference statistically significant. Treatment group overall efficacy is higher than the control group and the control group B, difference was statistically significant(P > 0.05).Conclusion: The efficacy of three-six methods is exact.The results of the research tell us,the restoration of knee function after surgery using the idea of three-six methods is better than CPM treatment.