Clinical And Mechanism Of Acupuncture Combined With Rehabilitation Therapy In Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Purpose: through acupuncture combined with rehabilitation therapy for children withcerebral palsy (spastic), with simple rehabilitation training group compared with therehabilitation therapy on children with spastic cerebral palsy clinical efficacy observedacupuncture..Method: Test design method, random-control study included in the June2011-2012inDecember Nanhai District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, Maternal and Child HealthHospital Children’s Department of Neurology inpatient nine months-5years old children withspastic cerebral palsy, were randomly divided into2groups, the treatment group and thecontrol group, the trainer of physical therapy, the efficacy evaluation of staff and children withtheir families do not know the subject of the grouping.Gross Motor Function AssessmentScale, muscle tension, muscle strength, range of motion assessment. Be acupuncturecombined with Bobath method based rehabilitation treatment, and3months of a course oftreatment, carried out for the two courses of treatment, for six months, observed beforetreatment, after treatment, a course of treatment, treatment2after changes in the course of thesituation before and after comparison.Result:1. In this study, the treatment group and the control group of children withspastic cerebral palsy30cases in each of the two groups of children with age, gender, GMFMtotal score before treatment, muscle tone, muscle strength assessment level and its jointactivity showed no statisticalsignificance.2. Two treatment groups within twenty-two contrast, were statistically significant,indicating that the two methods can improve the level of gross motor development of children,to improve the children with spasticity; through two groups before treatment, after treatment,atreatment, after treatment GMFM total score of the two treatments, joint activity between thegroups compared were statistically differences; muscle tone muscle group on long-term effectof the treatment group to improve spasticity better than the control group.Conclusion: The results of this study show the treatment and control groups beforetreatment, after treatment, a course of treatment, after treatment, two treatments compared tomuscle tension, muscle strength was no significant difference in the short-term treatment, suggesting that short-term rehabilitation and althoughchildren with gross motor functionimproved, but spasticity was still significantly lagging behind the normal level of children ofthe same age, the need to adhere to the long-term rehabilitation, to further improve spasticity,and promote large motor development gradually closer to normal motor function.