Comparative Research On The Korean And Chinese Patent In Communication Field

People’s demand for better communication is ever increasing so the communication industry faces wide prospects with the deepening of globalization. Information and communication technology has become an important driving force for the world economy growth and social progressing, in addition to its role as the strategic, basic and leading pillar industry in our national economy. However, communication market competition is more and more intense with the continuous deepening of economic globalization and integration Technical scramble, patent disputes are intensifying. In the essence, technical dispute is the patent dispute. To improve competitiveness and achieve long-term development in the fierce market, it is necessary to strengthen patent protection, emphasizing on the important role of patent strategy.At the same time, as the upgrade technology,China’s independent and innovated third generation of mobile communication standard of TD-SCDMA, the TD-LTE was determined as one of the international standards of the fourth generation mobile communications (4G) by the ITU in early2012.This is the best time to catch up and lead the world advanced technology for China telecommunication industry. In order to find out advantages and disadvantages between Chinese and Korean enterprises in the field of communication so as to propose suggestions for the patent development of the field, this paper makes a comparative research on the Chinese and Korean patents within the communication cycle.This paper has choose the most influential and representative enterprises in the field of communication between China and South Korea-ZTE, Huawei Technologies, LG Group and Samsung Electronics as the objects of comparative study. Collect and analyze the patent information of four companies with the use of the WIPO official website. Based on the patent map analysis method, reflect the patent information which implicated in the patent data in the form of intuitive charts. We have drawn the map technology development direction, technology requirement trend, patent annual trend, international classification and patent proportion of possession of four companies of China and South of Korea. Comparing patent technology status of four companies.By the means of analyze their patent development direction and present patent demand trend, we have discovered the direction and focus in the future of patent technology of the two countries. By analyzing the number and trend change in China’s and South Korea’s annual patent applications, international classification distribution, proportion in various fields, we have found out the key and hot point of patent technology in the four companies, the scope of its influence and competitiveness. And further analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of patent technology in communication field of China and South Korea, summarizing the successful experience of South Korea’s patent technology industrialization, which proposed suggestions for patent technology industrialization of our country. Meanwhile faced with the grim situation with less number of patents and low level patent quality as a whole of domestic enterprises at present, we put forward specific suggestions for carrying out patent strategy in different stages for enterprises.The innovation of this paper is that combine the research of patent technology and communication industries and make a comparative study of the two countries-China and South Korea with both similarity and fierce competition. Currently, domestic research is either on patent or communication industry, however, with a view to both the dependence on patent technology for communication industry and the important role in competition. Combine the two can provide some theoretical basis for Chinese enterprises to build core technology strategy and then improve own competitive power and viability. All the same, both China and South Korea are in Northeast Asia, geographical proximity and cultural origins, put them together to make a comparative research has an important practical significance.