On "paradigm" Shift In Histoircal Works Of Chinese Journalism

Although many scholars have put forward to get out of the old model to the ontologyparadigm change from the paradigm of revolutionary history, but how to change the differentopinions, but what is the body is still inconclusive. Some scholars to certain principles ofcommunication theory as the theoretical premise to the default re-combing the context of thedevelopment of journalism; Some scholars from the perspective of social development,emphasizing the interaction between journalism and social development; but these are did notget rid of exactly the same with the revolutionary history of single unified point of view ofhistorical research, which can not grasp the whole picture of the history of journalism overall.Therefore, through this thesis research, initially to solve the above problems, explore to beable to restore the true face of the history of ontology paradigm.First, trace the Schomburg sources to explore the birthplace of the revolutionary historyand the source of the theoretical and textual analysis of the relevant on use of meta-narrative theory, summed up the characteristics and shortcomings of the revolutionary history.Subsequently, the evolution of history, from the news, combined with the related theoreticaldefinition of the specific meaning of the ontology of journalism history, and on this basis tobuild "Pluralism," the general characteristics of the news ontology paradigm. Secondly, fromthe perspective of get rid of ideology and restore the ontological status of journalism history,reshaping the character of independent academic journalism and historical research,journalism history research the need for paradigm shift from the revolutionary historyparadigm to ontology, combined with three of the paradigm shift proposed avenue. Finally,this paper presents the significance of the restoration of China’s journalism history,science aswell as the history of Chinese journalism research paradigm diversification paradigm shift.