Whether Exist Really Fair In Static Game Decision-Making?

Abstract:The social phenomena such as the hatred the rich and envy jealousy the monopolize industry practitioners reflects the desire and expectations for social equitable distribution.People fair feel directly and indirectly affect their behavior and mental health,thereby affect social harmony.So fair is not only the sociology,ethics issues,but also the economics,psychology focus issues.The game exist in everywhere such as the political, economic,educational and other fields,behavioral game theory reveal the non-rational emotional factors which will inpact game decision-making by the individual psychological characteristics,behavioral characteristic,also study the individual game decision-making.A series of classical game experiments such as ultimatum and dictator experiment proved that people have equity preference in decision-making.The previous literature neglects the test about the fair of not directly related to their own interests,further explore the game decision-making motives.the internal psychological processes generated fair,and provide a theoretical basis for a fair psychological mechanism for the game decision-making.The work adapts the classic game experiments and the combination methods of quantitative and qualitative.The purpose was to ascertain wheather the fair conduct in the static game is really fair.The trial was choosen in Ultimatum experiment who make a fair decision,all the160four-year college students participate in third-party punishment experiment,a two-step experiments and interviews tested there exist really fair.The results of data statistics and strategies analysis shows that:(1)among the inequitable conduct college students in ultimatum,83.1%of the subjects will punish a unfair dictator.of which72.5%is a actually fair trial and6.9%is fair and moral subjects,3.1%subjected by the effect of the rights would choose to punishment dictator by sacrificing their own interests.And in extreme values,the punishment conduct will increase.(2)two sanction,third-party monetary sanctions and third-party rights sanctions.is significantly related on the.01level (bilateral).