| The self-help behavior is generally considered to be a super regulations of legitimation in criminal law.Because it is not legal status,the theory study of the self-help behavior is very limited in the criminal law educational world.The self-help behavior is short of the systemic and in-depth theoretical research,if it compares to Justifiable defence and emergency actions. But the self-help behavior often happens in the real life,The fuzzy theory causes the not unified practice.And there have been a strong social controversy.So we should define the scope of the self-help behavior correctly,and find a clear distinction between the boundaries of self-help behavior and other statutory basis, and create a clear the applicable way for self-help behavior.lt can guide people’s behavior reasonably and effectively.So as to make reasonable positioning of self-help behavior,this article uses the comparative study of methods to distinguish justifiable defense, self-help behavior and intentional injury.The author uses the value analysis method, and defines the main body of the self-help behavior,solves the the structure sin for error trying to save themselves.This paper is divided into three chapters content.The first chapter is the general overview of the self-help behavior of a series of controversial case.Find some disputed points of a few cases to discuss.The second chapter analyses the boundaries of self-help behavior,distinguishs justifiable defense, self-help behavior and intentional injury,defines the main body of the self-help behavior.So we can clear define clearly the self-help behavior.The third chapter trys to improve the advocate of self-help behavior,Through the analysis of the feasibility of self-help behavior into laws, self-help behavior of judicial selection are presented. |