Clinical Efficacy Of Ozone Minimally Invasive Combination Of Manipulation For Lumbar Disc Herniation

[Objective]Lumbar disc herniation is a common disease, the main clinical manifestations of waist, hip pain, pain and lower extremity pain, numbness, heavier main claudication and limb light, diminished sensation, muscle weakness. Serious impact on people’s work and life. This disease is more common in patients with elderly patients, its incidence in recent years was getting younger and younger. Clinical cure of the disease is easy to relapse, doctors believe is a difficult disease. Of treatment of lumbar disc herniation surgery and non-surgical treatment. Surgical treatment due to the inherent risk of preoperative fear, the high cost of treatment and many other factors cause most patients to choose non-surgical treatment. Massage non-surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation, the most unique and most effective treatment methods, there is no risk of harmful to humans, more effective, low cost is its advantage. In recent years, minimally invasive technique has been booming, ozone minimally invasive disc ablation is one of them. Strong oxidation of the main applications of ozone not only makes the nucleus pulposus tissue degeneration and atrophy, but also to avoid the disc infection, to reduce the occurrence of inflammatory edema, play a decompression, anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. Because of its positioning accuracy, simple operation, does not affect the stability of the spine, efficacy and stability, pain and low cost advantages by doctors and patients of all ages. The discussion of this topic focused on ozone minimally invasive disc ablation combined with clinical efficacy of massage for treatment of lumbar disc herniation with a single massage to treat the disease, to provide a new theoretical basis and choice of treatment for lumbar disc herniation.[Method]Collected in the period from September2010to March2012Massage Services Division of the Hubei Province Chinese Medicine Hospital treatment of lumbar disc herniation in96 cases. According to the sequence of visits to randomly divided into two groups:control group and observation group,48cases each. Two groups of patients to age, sex, duration after statistical analysis, no significant difference (P>0.05) were comparable.The observation group using ozone minimally invasive therapy combined with massage techniques to treat lumbar disc herniation, the control group was kept to use of manipulation for lumbar disc herniation. Patients admitted to hospital after the observation group, lumbar disc herniation in the CT downlink ozone minimally invasive interventional therapy, a week after surgery to be manipulation therapy for two courses. Two weeks after the referral. The control group was kept the use of manipulation for lumbar disc herniation2courses. Two weeks after the referral. Observe the effects were compared.[Result]1. Ozone minimally invasive treatment of lumbar disc herniation combined with manipulation therapy for two courses, two courses of treatment with a single deposit of manipulation, and the X2test, X2=1.975＜3.84, P＞0.05observation group efficacy and efficacy in the control groupno significant difference between the two groups have efficiency quite. 2. Observation group after ozone minimally invasive interventional treatment and treatment of manipulation therapy for two weeks, two weeks after the treatment with a single deposit of2courses of manipulation, after the X2test, X2=4.360>3.84P<0.05observation group efficacy and the efficacy of the control groupsignificant differences in the observation group was better than the control group.3. The main symptoms and signs integral comparison in the observation group and control group before and after treatment, after statistical treatment, two groups of symptoms and signs before and after treatment points compared a significant difference (P<0.05), and observed after the treatment group with control groupcompared to the significant difference (P <0.05).[Conclusion]1. The two groups were compared after treatment in both groups efficiently no significant difference in the efficacy of the observation group and control group is no different.2. The two groups of patients after treatment, in contrast to two weeks, two sets of efficiency there are significant differences in the observation group were significantly better than the efficacy of the control group. 3. After treatment, there were significant effects, the efficacy of ozone minimally invasive therapy combined with massage techniques for lumbar disc herniation is superior to single kept the use of manipulation therapy.