Optimization Research On The Technology Of Burning Treatment Of Chronic Tonsillitis

Obejective: Burning treatment of chronic tonsillitistechnology-the original method is each side tonsil time Scorch3iron,atotal of6iron, burning1times every2days,for10times.This topic for thefurther optimization of the technique,making it in effect under thecondition of unchanged,the reduction of treatment frequency and durationof treatment,namely the use of the experiment group(seven treatmentgroup)and control group (ten treatment group),to observe the experimentalgroup in the original technology on the basis of reduced treatment timesand time and the control group clinical therapeutic effect,the finalevaluation on treatment of chronic tonsillitis technique effectiveness,safetyand practicality. Methods:Choice has been diagnosed with chronictonsillitis ouptpatient cases,clinical treatment,observation of a casesaccording to the selectsd order,take a single bling random table is dividedinto the experimental group and the contrl group,experimental study wasconducted on a case,all the cases were treated by “burning technology”fortreatment,after treatment ended6months later after a trial participationstaff telephone follow-up,the calculating value,through the SPSS statisticsoftware to undertake statistical processing,were observed in theexperimental group and the control group in the clinical comprehensivetherapeutic effect evaluation technology for the treatment of chronictonsillitis,burning the effectiveness,safety and practicality,and judge for theexperimental group and the control group between the two groups clinicalcomprehensive therapeutic effect is the difference;at the same time thepatient efficacy of statistical treatment follow-up readme.Follow up againafter the experimental group and the control group were observed in thefollow-up effect,evaluation of burning technique in the treatment ofchronic tonsillitis effcttiveness,safety and practicality,and judge for the experimental group and the control group between the two groupsfollow-up effect whether has the difference,in order to achieve the purposeof experimental research. Result: By statistical analysis,the experimentalgroup and the control group patients were form sex,course of disease,agestructure,after statistics processing,P＞0.05,have no significant difference.The control group the total number of total49cases,completely cured21cases,accounting for42.9%;20cases,accounting for40.8%;effective in8cases,accounting for16.3%;invalid in0cases,which accounted for100%of total efficiency.The comprehensive curative after statistical processingP＜0.05,before and after treatment has significant difference;theexperimental group a total number of48patients,complete cure in13cases,accounting for27.1%;20cases,accounting for41.7%;effective in13cases,accounting for27.1%;invalid in2cases,accounting for4.2%of thetotal efficiency,which accounted for95.9%,the comprehensive curativeeffect after statistical procseeing P＜0.05,with significant difference beforeand after treatment.A total of two patients in the treatment group97cases,control group,the total efficiency of100%for the experimentalgroup,the total effective rate was95.9%,the clinical comprehensivetherapeutic effect by statistical processing P＞0.05,two groups had nosignificant difference between control group and experiment group,nosignificant difference between the clinical comprehensive therapeuticeffect.After the end of treatment for more than6months of telephonefollow-up,through statistical analysis,the control group of31cases werecured,14cases,effective for1cases,3cases ineffective,the total effectiverate was93.9%;the experimental group27cases were cured,11cases were8cases,effective,ineffective for in2cases,the total effective rate was95.8%,follow-up effect by statistical processing for P＞0.05,showed thatthe two groups had no significant difference between control group and experimental group,no significant difference between the follow-up effect.Conclusion:The control group and experimental group comprehensiveclinical efficacy and follow-up efficacy of the same treatment,two groupshad no significant difference between.This experiment suggests,burningtreatment of chronic tonsillitis technique curative effect is exact,treatmenttimes and time can be reduced,the burning treatment of chronic tonsillitiswith treatment technology has the asvantages of simpleoperation,treatment basically no pain,make the hospital medical risk offalling,the medical cost is low.As a kind of traditional Chinese drugtreatment technology characteristic,burning treatment of chronic tonsillitistechnology can not only retain the tonsils,remove tonsilinflammation,while preserving the tonsil’s own immune function.Themethod to maintain the health of people,and improve the people’s healthhas its great significance.Because of its effective treatment method,has theadvantages of simple operation,low cost treatment apparatus,the costis isnot high for the community to save a lot of health resources and humanresources,and produce great social benefit.Burning treatment of chronictonsillitis technique is suitable for various hospitals,especially for thosewith medical technology with lower levels of the majority of thegrass-roots hospital,although this method in the treatment of chronictonsillitis clinical efficacy has been a large number of clinicalvalidation,but the therapeutic methods of treatment still need furtherstudyto elucidate the mechanism of.