Comparative Study Of Two Combination Therapy In Treatment Of Knee Osteoarthritis

Subject:To summary the curative effect of two kinds of comprehensive therapies: the Two Combination Treatment(chinese traditional medicine to fuming and washing, the mamipulation treatment) and the Three Combination Treatment (small needle scapel to loose, the articular cavity for douche, sodium hyaluronate to inject articular cavity), which for treatment of light, medium knee osteoarthritis (KOA), and to study the therapy mechanism of them , providing basis to treat KOA patients for our Three Stairs Therapy, and to chooses the fit comprehensive treatment scheme for KOA suffererMethod:To collect 175 cases of the integrity totally data, full and accurate visit of the hospitalization KOA sufferers, according to the random choice and the voluntary principle of sufferers,they are divided into the A,B two groups .carry on the research among them, A group was adopted the Two Combination Treatment: Chinese traditional medicine to fuming and washing, and the mamipulation treatment, B group was adopted the three combination treatment: the small needle scapel to loose, the articular cavity for douche, sodium hyaluronic to inject articular cavity. All cases are light, medium sufferers during period of onset. 85 cases of A group: among them35 of male,50 of woman example; 90 cases of B group: among them 38 of male,52 of woman. 36 cases of A group ,34 cases of B group were light medium knee osteoarthritis sufferers. 49 cases of a A group, 56 cases of B group were medium knee osteoarthritis sufferers- By statistics the result indicats the patients of A group and B group were no difference ( P>0. 05) at the sex, age, weight, course of illness, X line cent degree, which learned by statistics analysis. It shows two groupes can be comparability. By the higher frequency symptoms, which were advertise for the body to the sufferers of KOA: rest pain, swell, press pain, squat down to rise pain, run about pain, the movable scope six observation index signs, we carried on treatment and graded point in front and back of treatment, and study their's curative effects and therapy mechanism by contrast research. Result:Through 1-2 years visit, the effectiveness rate of A group reach 95.29%, the effectiveness rate of B group reach 94.2%. By comparison the curative effect did not show the difference ( P>0. 05). To each group in front and back treatment grade point of rest pain, swell, presses the pain, squat down to rise the pain, run about the pain, the movable scope all shows the marked difference ( P<0.01), two sets sufferers...