Discussion On The Government Responsibility In Urban Housing System Reform In China

Urban housing system reform is a fundamental policy and a comprehension of series of methods and approaches. Urban housing system reform began at Deng Xiaoping's conversations about housing problems on 1978 and 1980, is a top-down reform that guided by government. After nearly three years of housing system reform, China's real estate industry has developed rapidly, and urban housing has improved a lot. But at the same time, also produced a series of problems, such as the housing prices rise rapidly, the housing problem for middle-income families protruding, low-income housing conditions improved slowly, housing supply structure adjustment pace is relatively slow, housing construction and consumption patterns extensive, etc. Real estate has strong pulling effect to economic growth, and the industry of Chinese real estate industry also bear the 1.3 billion population, if the fair residency housing problems to solve, and we will not only in the real estate market bubble serious harm, but also will lose to construct the harmonious society of socialism. But China's housing system reform has a series of housing problems, the main reason is the lack of government responsibility. Therefore, the study of urban housing system reform, the problem of lacking responsibilities appears very have realistic significances.Firstly, this essay recalls the development of urban housing system reform, and analyzes the achievements and problems. From the analysis of housing problems, pointed out that the specific responsibilities that government should undertake. The specific responsibilities include system arrangement responsibility, legal protection responsibility, administration according to law, financial support responsibility, supervision responsibility and for low-income housing safeguard responsibility. However, at present, the government responsibility in housing system reform has absence. The main performances of the government responsibility absence are that: shortages of institutional supply, poor of administrative management, lowing of financial investment rate, inadequate market supervision, shortages of low-income housing safeguard; the main causes of the government responsibility absence include: the dislocation of the value orientation, role chaos, excessive dependence on administrative power, insufficient capacity of government and slacking of the government's regulation. Finally, the paper proposes countermeasures to solve the government responsibility absence in housing system reform. One is to clear the government responsibility, strengthen the sense of responsibility. Two is to reform and perfect the administrative decision-making mechanism. Three is to increase the executive power. Four is to establish a multi-level administrative supervision system. The fifth is to establish a scientific and effective government performance evaluation system.