| The "black whistle" problem in football match has always been aroused the concern of the medias and communities in China because the "black whistle" issues have seriously affected the development of football match in our country. The bad affection is not only reflected in the development of the sport but also in the social justice issues. There are no clear legal and corresponding provisions for the "black whistle", so the controversy of the governance decisions is existed. The "Gong Jianping"case as the example of the "black whistle" issue in China was ended with the charge of bribe and caused considerable controversy in 2001. The High Court of China's Supreme People's Procurator-ate issued the "non-national staff accepting bribes" on November 6, 2007, and the "black whistle" issue is under the scope. That has reflected the issue of governance and controversial sanctions. Reflecting on the ruling of the "Gong Jianpingcase" and comparing to "Hoyzer Black Whistle case"in Germany soccer 2005, the consideration of Methods of criminal law enforcement Conference in the Football Referees illegal acts is aroused in China.In this paper, Football referees'illegal enforcement behavior as the subject, its concept and substantive content are analyzed from a criminal perspective of governance conferenced in the way of summarization, comparison, logical reasoning and case analysis combined with sociology and psychology. The conclusions and recommendations as followed:1.The concept of football referees'illegal acts is the kind of law enforcement that the Football Referees exploit his position to facilitate through non-equity means to achieve illegal interests and trampled on the principles of fair play sports which is against the honesty of the referee duties2.Football Referees'illegal acts are of substantive law enforcement. It's mainly reflected in the acts are against the law benefits, which has seriously affected the development of sport and has done harm to the society. 51st term in China Sports Law shows the act has to be held accountable by law provisions, but it has not made clear yet.3.Football Referees'illegal acts are lack of the Nature of criminal objective Elements, but with the content of criminal objective Elements to fulfil criminal subjective elements and criminal main elements.4.Basic on the analyzing the "Gong Jianping case"and the Germany " Hoyzer Black Whistle cases", soccer referees'illegal acts sentenced by accepting bribes or national staff accepting bribes is not enough.5.Excluding criminal matters in football referees'illegal acts is good for comprehensively governance of this issue and promoting the supervising construction.6.The law enforcements of the referee illegal crimes and crimes of manipulation sports competitions are proposed depended on the experiences of punishment in the law enforcements of the legal-year-old soccer referee'illegal acts and our country's factual.7.Depended on the experiences of punishment in the law enforcements of the legal-year-old soccer referee'illegal acts in the developed countries,football referees'illegal acts should be comprehensively governanced and prevented by many ways like the improving management system and the Sports referee system under the legal requirements, honesty payment and establishing Football Club financial monitoring system. |