| A stream has its source; a tree has its root. No matter what schools or scholarly ideas can't rely on or inherit the ideas of predecessor. My article depends on this idea to probe into the scholarly origins of comparative history of Marc Bloch and viewed from the historical to discuss the appellation of the father of modern comparative history of Marc Bloch.First, I introduce the content and characteristics of comparative history methodology of Marc Bloch from macrostructure to gain a understanding by the readers. Second, briefing of origins and developments of early comparative methods of west and the rise of modern comparative history to be the setup for the principal part of the article.The principal part of the article is four academic'ideas: Antoine Meillet, Emile Durkheim, Henri Berr and Henri Pirenne. To offer a method to the formation of comparative history methodology of Marc Bloch on the linguistics. What Antoine Meillet's La methode comparative en linguistque historique probes into the theory and methods of comparative linguistics impacts on a major influence for the formation of comparative history methodology of Marc Bloch. The theory of comparative social structure of Emile Durkheim offers a method to comparative history methodology of Mark Bloch on the demotic. In the book of feudal society, Marc Bloch takes full advantage of it; Because of Marc Bloch works for the magazine of Henri Berr for a long time. The history theory of Henri berr and he greatly encourages to use comparative methods impact on a major influence for the comparative history methodology of Marc Bloch. Henri Pirenne has tied up with Marc Bloch. He is the real power to Marc Bloch on the way of comparative history. Marc Bloch uses for reference and imitate many comparative methods which Henri Pirenne used.The above-mentioned four scholars'comparative methods and theories impact on a direct influence to the formation of comparative history methodology of Marc Bloch. I will elaborates on it as a focal point... |