Study On The Difference Of The Subjectivity Of "Bing/Ke"+Negation

Study on modern Chinese grammar, the adverb which has special individualities ,is a kind of function lexical.The modal adverb is such an adverb that can express personal subjective will and emotional recognition.It has abstract and extensive meaning. All kinds of modal adverb have inalienable connection, meanwhile, with significant difference in combining manners,grammar function,semantic,pragmatic feature.The object of this thesis is analyzing two examples of modern Chinese modal adverb——"Bing"and"Ke"From the comparison we can conclude that"Ke"+Negation has high subjectivity, while"Bing"+Negation has low subjectivity. This is the obvious difference between"Bing"+ negation and"Ke"+ Negation, because of the difference on subjectivity. The lexical models of"Bing"+Negation and"Ke"+Negation have different categories, the lexical models with stronger subjectivity, such as declaration, admonition, dissuasion etc. are adapted to"Ke"+Negation pattern. The lexical models with strong objectivity are adapted to "Bing"+Negation pattern, such as attribute. Meanwhile, to explain differences between"Bing"+Negation and"Ke"+Negation by analyzing the using of them in cognitive pragmatic.Most Chinese modal adverb are evolves from the full wordcomes, modal adverb and its subjective significance has experienced the process of the reality to the empty by grammatical and glossary in history, as well as the subjective process of significance has gradually changed from objective to subjective. These processes both can explain the origin of modal adverb and its subjective significance, and explains the reason of simultaneous difference, thus lets us have the possibility to completely understand the modal adverb. We must inspect the history which it evolved to make thorough analysis to the modal adverb. Therefore, in the research, we had persisted the principle of duration and simultaneity.The subjectivity all has the rich performance method in each language, the people always in naturally use these methods to express the rich sentiment. In Chinese, these methods mainly include the function word and some grammar structures. In Chinese multitudinous expression subjective function word, the modal adverb has the biggest quantity, a higher frequency of use, also the strongest strength display, and richest subjective significance, such as, expressing the teller understanding to the thing, the event, including makes the judgement and the appraisal, also expressing the teller emotion, the will and the manner. Generally, the modal adverb is expressing the teller's sentiment, understanding, will and manner to the subjective and objective world has stronger performance strength, this is specifically manifests of the modal adverb's subjective. The different modal adverb expression subjective significance and subjective sentiment are different, the degree of subjective also has difference. The modal adverb"Bing"and"Ke"are adapted to"Ke"+Negation and"Bing"+Negation"pattern, expresses have interlinked places. So what differences are the two have in the subjectivity, how to use "the subjectivity" to reasonably explain difference between the two. They are worth us studying on.Because of the difference on subjectivity, the lexical models of"Bing"+ negation and"Ke"+ Negation have different categories, the lexical models with stronger subjectivity, such as declaration, admonition, dissuasion etc. are not adapted to"Bing"+Negation pattern. Meanwhile, the lexical models with strong objectivity, such as strong objective etc are not suitable for"Ke"+ Negation pattern. We separately explain differences between the two by analying the using of them in cognitive pragmatic, this may provide the reason from language evolution and grammar in-depth for the corresponding language teaching.The subjectivity and subjective of modal adverb is the topic which is worth the academic circles paying attention to. Studies on this topic, not only may deepen us to understand the modal adverb significance and usage, but also may provide a"wide-angle lens"of observing language development for us, especially the grammar, the glossary and the subjective of language . This is helpful excavating inherent rules of evolves of Chinese. The rules possibly has the certain reference value for studying on the language general feature.