The Comparison Of "Principle Of Marxist Philosophy" And "Dialectical Materialism And Historical Materialism"

Marxism philosophy that was represented by textbooks in the form of principle system came out originally in the Soviet Union, it was used to broadcast Marxist theory to the nation and make them possess the Marxist thinking mode. In a certain sense, it also made the Marxist philosophic textbook shoulder the theory idiosyncrasy of spreading and popularizing Marxist. The Marxist philosophy as the world view and the methodology of the proletariat compared with the previous philosophy has had the possibility of having maximum mass base in the theory level, it was the Marxist philosophy textbooks` publish, distribution, popularization that changed the possibility into reality. It was the "textbook" that made Marxist philosophy from lonely voices of "the spring snow" into " popular literature ".At present, there is a debate whether Marxist philosophic textbooks can convey the essential spirits of Marxist philosophy theory in theory circle. And in our country there was a historical period that existed "Soviet model" and"take example from Soviet". Chinese Marxist philosophic textbooks, especially early versions, had been considered as the copies of the Marxism philosophic textbooks of "Soviet model", and there was no innovation in the construction and contents. This paper tries to compare "Marxist Philosophy Principle" (which was edited by Constantine Panov and published by the Soviet union academy of sciences institute of philosophy in 1958) with China editor "Dialectical Materialism Historical Materialism"(which was edited by Ai Siqi and published in 1961) to get a shallow conclusion. Marxist philosophic textbooks have its long development path both in China and in the Soviet Union, and also have many versions. The reason why I choose the two versions to compare is that the latter was edited by the first local power and it had the important significance in the development of Chinese Marxist philosophic textbooks, and there is another reason that the two versions had the near editor and publish time, and their contents depended on Marxist philosophy that was at the same development phase.This paper is divided into four parts. Firstly, it is preface part, and it discusses simply about the scientific character of the Marxist philosophy textbooks` "Soviet model" ,whether China adopted "take in" to the "Soviet model"or not, and whether it embodies the spirit temperament of Chinization; Secondly, \in the first chapter of the paper, it is the comparison about the contents of the two Marxist textbooks; in the second chapter of the paper, it is the comparison about the construction of the two teaching textbooks; in the third part of the paper, it is the comparison and analysis about the total style that is embodied in the paper; in the conclusion, it discusses the conclusion that is obtained from the content, structure, and style.The innovations of the paper is to choose the two teaching books ,"Marxist Philosophy Principle" and "Dialectical Materialism Historical Materialism" that were published in the same time, from numerous Marxist philosophic textbooks on the base of time, to compare them from the theory content, the constructer of chapters, the style of writer, and so on to do my own conclusion.Furthermore, the paper takes the way of combination of narrative and discussion, which is different from the writing style of narrative firstly and discussion later.