Studying Of The Relevance Between The Serum Sex Hormone And Liver Depression Impotence Syndromes

【Objective】To investigate the serum sex hormone and liver depression impotence Syndromes relevance,preferred impotence objective evidence of liver depression indicators.【Ways】1.A non-random selection of patients with liver stagnation card 60 cases of impotence and 40 cases of normal control group,and then to serum sex hormones Detect parameters.2. Observing stagnation of liver-type impotence and normal control group of serum sex hormone parameters and statistical credits Analysis.【Results】1.Stagnation of liver-type erectile dysfunction in patients with age group 20-30 years old accounted for 40%,31-40-year-old group accounted for 35 percent,while over the age of 50 in each group accounting for 15%followed by decrease,6.7%,1.7%,1.7%.2.Liver depression and erectile dysfunction in patients with type TT,LH,PRL,FSH,E₂ single parameter of the exploratory analysis found,TT showed a normal distribution,LH,PRL,FSH, E₂ was non-normal distribution.3.Stagnation of liver-type impotence and normal TT level of the control group no significant difference,(p=0.502,p＞0.05);stagnation of liver-type type impotence and LH levels in normal control group no significant difference,(p=0.135,p＞0.05); stagnation of liver-type impotence and normal control group,PRL levels were significantly different,(p=0.02,pp＜0.05);stagnation of liver-type impotence with normal FSH levels of the control group no significant difference,(p=0.393,p＞0.05);stagnation of liver-type impotence and E₂ levels in normal control group no significant difference,(p=0.360,p＞0.05); 4.PRL as discriminant are stagnation of liver-type impotence or normal control group of parameters,(p=0.029,p＜0.05),there is significant difference,identify effective,efficient discriminant 66.7%;TT as discriminant are stagnation of liver-type impotence or normal control group of parameters,(p=0.470,p＞0.05),no significant difference,The discriminant is not valid;LH as discriminant are stagnation of liver-type impotence or normal control group of parameters,(p=0.342,p＞0.05),no significant difference,The discriminant is not valid;FSH as a judge are stagnation of liver-type impotence or normal control group of parameters,(p= 0.671,p＞0.05),no significant difference,The discriminant is not valid;E₂,as Liver depression are discriminant type impotence or normal control group of parameters,(p=0.126,p＞0.05),no significant difference,The discriminant is not valid.【Conclusion】Liver The study found that erectile dysfunction in patients with stagnation of liver-type-based mainly young and middle-aged;stagnation of liver-type serum sex hormones in serum of male erectile dysfunction,impotence and stagnation of liver-based control group TT,LH,FSH,E₂ levels was no significant difference,while the PRL than normal increase in the control group,a significant difference;TT,LH,FSH,E₂,as is the stagnation of liver-type discriminant impotence or normal control group of parameters,no significant differences, identify invalid,and PRL as a judge is the stagnation of liver-type impotence or the parameters of the normal control group,there were significant differences,identify effective.Prolactin level,therefore reflect the stagnation of liver-type laboratory indicators of male erectile dysfunction,the difference is the stagnation of liver-type of male erectile dysfunction,an important basis for diagnosis,can be used as evidence of male erectile dysfunction,stagnation of liver-type one of the indicators of the objective.