A Study On The Acquisition Of Transitional Connection Components Of Chinese Texts For Korean International Students

This dissertation presents an analysis of adversative connectives,as well as an analysis of how well they are acquired by Korean students in the process of learning modern Chinese.The Chinese rules are mainly as follows:In “buguo” (不过) group,the integral situation are mainly as follows:the frequency of use of adversative connectives can be ranked from high to low as this: “er”(而) “buguo”(不过)、 “zhishi”(只是).The proportion of connecting sub-clauses is high in “er”.The proportion of connecting sentences and paragraphs is high in “buguo”.The ability of collocation of “buguo”group is weak.Adversative connectives tend to not match other words when used.The situation of “buguo”(不过) are mainly as follows:The administrative range of “buguo” is less than or equal to the connective range of “buguo”.The administrative range of “buguo” is the adversative text which “buguo” administrates.The number of clauses which are administrated by “buguo” are dispersed distribution.The numbers of clauses which locate around the adversative connectives are dominated by an asymmetric distribution.The semantic relationships of previous items and after items which “buguo” administrates are mainly supplementary sort.The situation of “er”(而) are mainly as follows:The number of clauses which are administrated by “er” are diverse distribution.The sort of one and one are the main distribution.The semantic relationships of “er” is only opposite sort.The sort of certain and negation in simultaneous opposition is the unique usage of “er” .In the sort of certain and negation,the proportion of the formula of negation-certain is higher than the formula of certain-negation.In “danshi”(但是)group,the integral situation are mainly as follows:The connected language units of adversative connectives are mainly sub-clauses which constitute compound sentences.The numbers of sub-clauses which locate around the adversative connectives are dominated by an asymmetric distribution.The syllables of conjunctional adversative connectives are proportional to the level of language units.The situation of “danshi”(但是)are mainly as follows:The numbers of clauses which are administrated by “danshi” are unbalanced distribution.Overall,when the numbers of clauses are less,the distributions will be more.The semantic relationships of previous items and after items which “danshi”administrates are mainly opposite sort and causal sort,and the supplementary sort is the minority.The semantic relationships of “danshi” and “buguo” are complementary distribution.The situation of “que”(却)are mainly as follows: “que” is mainly unmarked collocation when paired with other words.The administrative ability and connective ability of “que” which represents adverbial connectives are weaker than “danshi” which represents conjunctional connectives.The semantic relationships of “que” and “danshi” are similar,but the distribution of “que” is more uneven.The acquisition conditions are mainly as follows:In “buguo”(不过)group,the integral situation are mainly as follows:The correctness and errors of each adversative connective have their own characteristics.The usage of connectives shows a tendency of insufficient use.The number of examples of “zhishi” is only 8.The amount and species of words which match “buguo” in interlanguage are higher than Chinese.The situation of “buguo”(不过)are mainly as follows:The semantic relationships of previous items and after itemswhich “buguo” administrates can be ranked from high to low:opposite sort,causal sort and supplementary sort,and this condition has a big differences from Chinese.The semantic relationships of “buguo and danshi” are not complementary distribution in interlanguage.The situation of “er”(而)are mainly as follows:The numbers of clauses which are administrated by “er” are symmetrical distribution.In the semantic relationships of “er”,the formula of negation-certain in the sort of certain and negation are in the leading status.The structure of “bushi……ershi” is excessive use in interlanguage.The errors of redundancy have a lot of distribution in each phase.There are more errors in the higher-phase.In “danshi”(但是) group,the integral situation are mainly as follows:The total correct rate is 65.5%.The acquisition condition is not very ideal.The usage of connectives shows a tendency of excessive use.The proportion of connecting paragraphs is far less than Chinese.Adversative connectives tend to match other words when used. “suiran” is the majority in the matched words.The situation of “danshi”(但是)are mainly as follows:There are four errors which are redundancy,omit,misuse and unclear expression.Redundancy is the majority.The sort of wrong order doses not appear.The development trend of errors is opposite U.The situation of “que”(却)are mainly as follows: “que”is mainly marked collocation when paired with other words.The semantic relationships of previous items and after items which “que” administrates are mainly opposite sort,supplementary sort doses not appear.Compared to “danshi”,the sort of errors adds wrong order.The sort of wrong order is the mainly error.The proportion of redundancy and misuse are also high.Compared to “danshi”,the errors of “que”are dispersed distribution.