| Using the descriptive case study method, this researcher examined the resource allocation decision-making process in the context of site-based management. Key issues examined were on what, how, why, and by whom resources are directed.Data were collected through a case study investigation of three similar urban elementary schools currently using site-based management. Budget sheets, meeting agendas, and summaries of minutes along with results of a multipart survey were analyzed.The conclusions showed that principals, teachers, and other staff, in that order, had the most involvement in resource allocation decision making. This hierarchy of local involvement showed a dramatic change from the pre-reform days when district personnel and principals held the power. Also, teachers showed the most gains in involvement after site-based management was implemented. Further, it is noteworthy that while parents and community representatives were now involved in the resource allocation process, their involvement and perceived benefit from the process were rated low. Finally, a perceived overall benefit of local decision making was greater staff awareness and more effective response to student needs through innovation and change. |
