Research On Dynamics Of Spatial Evolution In Cultural Industry

In recent years,the development of China’s cultural industry has been increasingly towards a’simple get together’ trend.The structure of industrial space also appears disorganized.Extensive development of the start-up period may be part of the reason of this problem,but at this stage the common ideas of pursuiting the so-called agglomeration economies,only focusing on the cultural enterprises "geographical proximity" instead of its "relevance" to identify and nurture industrial development ideas,maybe the crux of the problem.Compared with other industries,cultural industries pay more attention to creativity,style,skills,and abilities which are present a high degree of diversity and heterogeneity of the individual level elements.Through the interactive communication between the creative talent,it often forms socialization network relations characterized by "embeddedness".The daily productive activities of cultural enterprises are more inclined to the project team,the project network and such flexible way.Then it can not help to ask how the cultural industry chooses one from some or many possible geographical structures.It is just the spatial evolution of mechanism of the cultural industry?For the answer to this question,the paper will dismantle the problem into three interrelated sub-problems,that is,the respective dynamic mechanism of industry level,the corporate level and system-level of spatial evolution of cultural industries.The behind logic is that despite the existing studies have shown that the agglomeration of economic theory in traditional economic geography also applies to the interpretation of the issues of the spatial concentration of cultural industries.But as a industry relying more on creativity and innovation elements at the level of the individual,the spatial evolution of the cultural industry actually depends more on individual behavior and its impact of cultural.The emphasis on the micro-based of the spatial evolution of the cultural industry is a major innovation of this passage.In consideration of China’s long-standing background of government-led economic development,the evaluation and judgment of the choice of organization system of the spatial evolution of the cultural industry is very necessary.Ofcourse,this paper of the study considers the constraints of information technology innovation.This paper uses both of empirical research and normative research paradigm,based on the data of 13 prefecture-level city cultural industries in Jiangsu,using a random effects model(Chapter 2),the logistic regression model(Chapter V)and the knowledge model of choice of organization institutional choice(Chapter Ⅵ).They test or discussed the influencing factors and mechanism of spatial evolution of cultural industries respectively.So then it answer the research problem proposed in the introduction(Chapter Ⅰ).In addition,the paper also discussed and summarized(Chapter Ⅱ)the involved basic concept and theoretical basis of spatial evolution of the cultural industries,and put forward that the theoretical basis of the research on spatial evolution of cultural industries is the combinition of related disciplines which is based on the evolution of economic geography and cultural economics.The paper also describes and quantitatively analyzes the evolution and spatial agglomeration of Jiangsu Cultural Industry Evolution(Chapter Ⅲ),which provides the practical background for the follow-up research of Jiangsu Cultural Industry spatial evolution dynamics.The results of this study highlight the cultural industries in the spatial concentration of industry heterogeneity and diversity in the industry characteristics(Chapter Ⅲ,Chapter Ⅳ)and confirm that the organizational practices diffusion model can explain the spatial evolution of the cultural industry well(Chapter Ⅴ),and point out that with the development of information technology,in order to retain organizational effectiveness,the institutional arrangements of spatial evolution of China’s cultural industry should be turned from government-led to market-oriented.Of course,there is something subsequent to be expanded.For example,the theory of industrial clustering in the application of cultural industries,the identification of organizations practice diffusion to other means and their interactions,and whether the ideas are applicable to the service industry and spatial evolution analysis of other related industries and so on.