Research On The Relationship Between The Substitution Of Operate Subjects And Economic Performance

The direct cause of my topic selection is the thinking of the realistic problem, specifically to make an experience summary of achievements that got since China’s the reform and opening up and reflect on the more serious phenomenon of the state-owned economy instead of private economy. Both of them seem to point to a same conclusion, which is substitute relation between main bodies of market will have significant impact on economic performance. In view of the current situation that there is not any long periods and system analysis results of this problem, so we will make a system carding of the substitute relation between state-owned subject and private subject after the westernization movement, and take the industry into the outline, study the economic performance of different periods, and try to find the intrinsic relationship between them.In this paper, the research will unfold mainly through three aspects、 seven chapters.Firstly, through the first four chapters, we will analysis the main body of market management respectively. Specific include the development of government-run、government supervised and merchant manageds private enterprise in the period of westernization movement; The formation of the state capital and the rapid development of the national capital in the period of northern warlords government; The formation of state monopoly capitalism and the overall contraction of private industry in the period of Nanjing national government; The coexist of various economic elements in the period of the new democracy; The universal coverage in state-owned enterprises and the demise of the private enterprises after the socialist transformation; The reform of state-owned enterprises and the great development of private economy after the period of the reform and opening up. At the same time we will analyze every stage’s economic developments, the selected indicators are the output value of industry、per capita capital quantity、number of the enterprise、technical indicators、 industrial structure、urban population、economic output、per capita income and so on, depend on different circumstances.Secondly, we have a comparative analysis of the substitute relation and economic performance between main bodies of market through the content of the first chapter, the basic conclusion is:when private enterprises development, instead of state-owned enterprises acts as a main body of market, economic performance is better; In the opposite, there is a poor economic performance. To this conclusion, this paper holds that the root cause is whether to set up the mechanism of fair competition in the market. The lack of property right incentive mechanism Lead to low-efficiency of state-owned enterprises, its competition in the market mostly rely on its monopoly position endowed by administrative privilege, it is harmful to the market competition mechanism; Private enterprise efficiency is higher, it is useful to the market competition mechanism.Thirdly, use two chapters to get a longitudinal analysis of the history and horizontal comparative stud. Studies have found that, state-owned operation has a long history in China, date back to HAN dynasty period, since all previous dynasties, the truth that government-run industry and commerce instead of private manufacturing and commercial is always there, most of military industry are official form, most of civilian industry are government supervised and merchant managed form in the period of westernization movement. The nationalization in the periods of the northern warlord’s government and Nanjing national government consolidate the traditional of state-owned operation. After liberation, socialist transformation continued this historical trend until the reform and opening up, it has weakened. So, we can know that, the future of china’s economic depends on the future of private economy. In this kind of vertical comb, the border of government function tend to be more clear, that is, adjust the macro economy through fiscal、financial、industrial policy and so on, only to provide public products and operate the non-profit sector. In this kind of lateral comparative study, we will choose Japan and Germany as our comparative object, because both of them are overtaking-model industrial countries and the governments’role is big, but the market operators rely on private enterprises. After comparison, we found that the key to the success of the Japanese is industry breeding and business initiating policy in the period of Mejia restoration, its core lies in government-run demonstration enterprises, it encourage private investment in the business. The key to the success in Germany’s early industrialization is to encourage free competition, the government provide superior environment for the development of private enterprises, and the key to rapid rise after world war is the establishment of social market economy system, the government run as a "referee", not a "competitor".Based on the above argument, this article concludes the core viewpoint is:the situation that state-owned enterprises acts as an main body instead of private enterprises will reduce the economic performance, the opposite is not, the root cause is whether or not conducive to fair competition mechanism; the function of the government must establish competition mechanism as core functions, and should not directly act as management body.