| The process of discussing China design institution , is also a process to analysis Chinese design.Towards design, institution means some forced implications. Laying aside such an "absolute design" environment, we may directly face the "design words". This behavior comes from one of problem in our researching: outside of the main system such as "folk art", "art and craft", "modern handicraft", "modern design", "The sciences of the artificial", "design science" ,if, there is an independent form of design research?For a long time, there was a kind of prejudice that design theory founded on fine art theory and architectural theory. However, each "picture", "form", "pattern", "staff", "style" and "standardize" from our ancient documents reminds us the research tradition of China design theory is profound. It's actually an attempting to restore "physical" and "systemadical" by design institution research: to integrate those fragments of material and un-material things back to a structure of design thought and its tradition, which was ever in unity.On this basis, this paper mentioned that Design is an overall thoughtfulness and value integration to the object system; and China design institution is the tradition of thoughts and the basic pattern of value integration, which forms around the Chinese people's creation of objects. Therefore, we used the paper's style of Song Dynasty and the kiln of Qing Dynasty as example, tried to established some links of academic thesis, such as "shi", "qi", "ti", "fashi", "gongzaozhishi" "qiyicangli", "world", "public" and so on, carrying on our research in these mutual limitation nets.In addition, this paper is also expressing my desire to China designolgy's construction: The history of China designolgy and its system of research should be prudently understand and analysis, whose method is not complex, only needs earnestly: attention to presently, and penetrate into traditions with holding each one of their presently. |
