| Objectives The thesis build an evaluation index system of information literacy for nursing staff, providing the basis to enhance the level of information literacy of nursing staff.Methods 1 Through a literature review and expert interviews, familiar with the basic theory of information literacy and standard, initially established with 4 level indicator 10 secondary indexes, 48 three indicators information quality evaluation index system of item pool; 2 Document analysis software citespace literature review location information literacy experts in related fields, filter specialists from Hebei, Hubei, Anhui, Sichuan,Beijing, Heilongjiang in 6 different provinces and cities, area for clinical nursing research,nursing education, nursing management, 6 Professional. Using the improved two-round Delphi Delphi method, to filter the index, the study by consulting, record the results,feedback to the experts once again revise the three indicators together to consult experts,Record the results and feedback to the experts once again revise the three indicators together to consult experts, expert opinions converge in the second round, the Advisory ends. Establish information quality evaluation index system According to the index evaluation system of information accomplishment of nursing staff questionnaire that I sent to second all the nursing staff in the hospitals of Tangshan, And to verify the reliability and validity of the questionnaire, to judge the reliability of the scale of internal consistency,content validity assessment of its validity.3 Spss19.0 for expert advice and a statistical analysis of the survey results as a whole.Results 1 Two rounds of the Delphi expert consultation results show that experts have a better professional and geographic representation, expert working for more than 20 years at80%, has a profound knowledge of skills; 2 Two rounds of expert enquiry form the effective recovery of 100% reflects the tremendous support of the experts on the subject.Two rounds of consultations of experts on indicators of authority was 0.84 0.88, is greater than 0.7, displayed higher levels of authority of experts. Two rounds of investigations,expert coordination of overall coefficient of 0.168, 0.335, respectively(P<0.005) increased coordination of expert opinion in the second round, a convergence of ideas.3 Evaluation index system of information literacy of nursing staff screening, combined with expert advice, to indicators at all levels is greater than 3.5 and variation coefficient less than0.2500 as standard, First round of investigations to merge, delete, and modify indexes,level indicator delete of information ethics, merged into the information ethics information ethics and morality Secondary indexes about Internet regulations are deleted, merged to comply with information Ethics regulations, three indicators to recognize information regarding the importance of and recognizes the importance of information for work deleted,Changes for information on practice and the importance of research, a total of 19, in the second round to three indicators respect the fruits of others ' labour and justified to merge another article, Increased familiarity with patent registration system consolidated amendment 3, other experts a convergence of ideas; application of Delphi method to determination of index weights at all levels.4 Information consciousness of nursing ethics and morality, nursing, nursing information capacity weight 0.1408, 0.1252, 0.1252 respectively, also calculated that three entries weight.Conclusions 1 Through the Advisory 15 senior experts, puts the information consciousness and information ability and information ethics 3 level indicator 9 secondary indexes and 41 third-level indicators of evaluation index system of information accomplishment of nursing staff. 2 Data analysis results show that the evaluation index system of information literacy of nurses has good reliability and validity. Among them,master degree or above, accounting for about 66.7%, consultants have served as the tutor experience, about 60%, has a strong research strength. 4 Survey of information literacy of nursing staff, nursing staff information literacy questionnaire for internal consistency reliability 0.8619, content validity 0.854, with good reliability and validity. |
PDF Full Text Request